• VeganPizza69 Ⓥ@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    6 months ago

    What would even be the design solution without massive empty space? Add a lot of columns? Make the long content horizontal instead of vertical?

    • wizzor@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      6 months ago

      I think for most web apps it doesn’t make sense to allow the width to get so wide, except when the content being displayed is a columnar list and even then it’s a pretty marginal benefit.

      What I’ve done is limit the max-width to some amount of px/chars and allowed the remaining space be empty, with an exception for when displaying tables. Even with tables, the bigger width is only beneficial if either the contents of the columns are large enough, or there are very many columns to show. The solution in my mind is limiting the column widths to the longest content.

  • joneskind@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    6 months ago

    I have 2 24" displays side by side. At some point I unified the desktops (or Spaces if you’re on Linux) to make it act “as if” it was a single ultra wide monitor. This was absolutely awful to use, especially during Google meetings where I had to share my screen.

    Besides, I like being able to rotate 90° one of my screen because sometimes it’s just the best way to work.

    This thing is stupid. Appealing maybe, but stupid.