- cross-posted to:
- [email protected]
- cross-posted to:
- [email protected]
You must log in or register to comment.
It’s crazy that a company would sue over things that preceded its existence, but not hard to believe when you have limitless money and an army of eager lawyers.
And it doesn’t hurt to have hordes of people who just eat up anything they put out
What do you think if they put out apples?
Hero
The hero we needed <3
God bless you
Die, Apple, please die.
Replaced with archived link to bypass paywall.
Hmm still takes me to the unarchived one. I wonder if link updates don’t propagate across instances.
I should test that.
@BrikoX @Johnnypneumoniac I get a “secure connection failed” error in my browser for this link
Something on your end is blocking the connection then. You can try https://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cache:https%3A%2F%2Fwww.wired.com%2Fstory%2Fapple-vs-apples-trademark-battle%2F
@BrikoX ah, thanks!
In this market of efficiency, Apple shareholders should push to trim these people that are wasting resources to pursue useless IP hedgemony.
Part of me wants the apple farmers in Switzerland to leverage their preexisting rightful claim on all things (fruit) apple and go into the computer hardware business to take on Apple, just out of spite.
deleted by creator
I can see McCartney and Starr popping up again, Hello!
And apple fan-bro(tte)s will continue giving them money to do this shit
