I think this video showcases an interesting aspect of gaming that I never really thought about before. In their case, they play more games for a shorter amount of time vs spending a large portion of their time in few games.

Personally I’m on the side of spending more of my time in a select number of games. By far I have put no less then 3000-4000 hours in Minecraft. Logged by Steam, I got 1300+ hours in both GTA V and American Truck Simulator

More recently I’ve been really into Rocket League and Trackmania. These games are notable because I am constantly working to improve and get better at the game. As much replay-ability as much I find enjoyment in succeeding.

From time to time though, I do really enjoy getting into shorter, more story based games. Great examples being Portal 2, Road96, and Firewatch. What kind of gamer are you?

  • sylverstream@lemmy.nz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Depends on your stage of life as well. I’m 41 now and a dad, so I have max 2 hours per day. When I was still studying I played wow for entire days.

    Now I enjoy shorter games like Firewatch and Lake. Just finished Beacon Pine. Xbox Gamepass is excellent for this as it’s full of these games.

    I did play longer games like Mass effect legendary edition, and The Witcher 3, but I only play such long games if I really like them.

    Thousands of hours in a game is unfortunately out of the question.

    • 0xtero@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      I’m 50+ and while my kids are old though to manage without me, I still have plenty of other responsibilities.
      I don’t really “track” my gaming and I think the focus on hours spent is a bit silly.

      I play when I have time to relax.
      It’s mostly WoW, single-player RPGs, Paradox Grand Strategy games, online chess etc - stuff that doesn’t need twichy eye-hand coordination, too old and slow for that - games like that make me frustrated, because I used to be competitive in Quake back in the day. Just can’t keep up with the kids :)

      Mechabellum has been my latest addiction

    • ISOmorph@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      I’m your age and I’m in a similar situation. I still play longer RPGs when I really like them but it’s definitely harder to do. My last forever game was warframe. I clocked in about 3300 hours.

  • LootGoblin42@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    1 year ago

    When did people start tracking how many hours they play? I used to play games for hours a day. I loved getting lost in them, but I never kept track of hour many hours I spent. Now I’m a dad with a full time job, so I only get to play a little bit every once in a while. But when i get an hour to play I really enjoy it a lot!

    • Mister_Bald@lemmy.caOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      The only reason I know how many hours I have is because steam & other stores track how many hours you have in games. Minecraft is one game that doesn’t global counter, however & I agree its nice to just get lost and enjoy playing with friends.

    • pickytea@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      This is an interesting question. I never thought about it until platforms started showing it. I bet I have shockingly low hours on games from my childhood that I consider my “formative” or “beloved” games. I act like I spent years playing Ocarina of Time but was it actually like 20 hours?

  • surrendertogravity@wayfarershaven.eu
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    1 year ago

    There are 5 games on my Steam list over 100 hours, maxing out ~300 hours: Stardew Valley, Skyrim, No Mans Sky, Don’t Starve, Cyberpunk 2077

    If we include Nintendo games it probably goes up to 8: BotW, TotK, Animal Crossing New Horizons.

    So at the most, I’ll spend a couple months on a game before moving on - most other games I play are either quick weekend completions, or maybe take a couple of weeks to finish. Usually when I start putting months into a game I begin to seriously question whether I’m making the best use of my time and the “what am I doing with my life” itch makes me quit games for a bit. 😅

  • Poopfeast420@feddit.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    1 year ago

    Most story games I play once, however long they take. Only a few get the “privilege” of a re-play.

    Multiplayer games or games that don’t really have an ending I might put in more, like 200h in PUBG, 420h in Satisfactory (so far), 400h+ in Monster Hunter World, different roguelikes with 100h+, etc.

    On Steam, the two games I’ve put in more time than almost all others are Nioh 1 and 2, with a combined 1200h. That’s not even multiple characters.

    Only looking at Steam, it’s probably pretty even between story games and these “forever games.”

    Then there are Blizzard games, which I’ve played more than basically anything else. I have probably over 25k hours in WoW, thousands in Diablo 2 and 3, hundreds in Heroes of the Storm and Overwatch. Their games pretty much always do it for me, which is a shame, since it was revealed how much of a shitshow the company is, so I currently don’t play their games.

  • Neirin@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    1 year ago

    Racing games and multiplayer I can put hundreds of hours into, but it feels like single player games are too long these days. I prefer 20-30 hours for the main story although I do enjoy playing 60+ hour jrpgs occasionally.

      • RedForFred@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        AC Odyssey took me like 80+ hours, Valhalla apparently takes even longer. I feel like open world SP games take longer (and usually overstay their welcome)

        • AnagrammadiCodeina@feddit.it
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Which for the price they ask i would say its the minimum. Recently i played “resident evil village” 10 hours, good game but very short.

  • Grimace@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    1 year ago

    I like a variety of experiences so 20 hours seems about the sweet spot for me per game. Except for multiplayer games, which I can play on and off for years. I’m sure I’ve accumulated a combined couple thousand hours out of Counterstrike, TF2, and Halo over the years for instance.

    • PhreakyByNature@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      What I enjoy about CS is everyone starts back from the same level on each map in terms of loadout and budget. Yet every game is different in one way or another, with different people in matchmaking or even different macro or micro decisions by familiar players. So even playing the same 5 maps means they are different each time you play. It’s why I’ve been playing CS since 1.0 and have logged just shy of 2000 hrs in CSGO. I can’t remember how many hours I have played of CS in the pre-Steam era but it used to be 4-5 hour stints I reckon. Now I play 1-3 hours or so max, and that only 1 or 2 times a week.

  • Child Eater@iusearchlinux.fyi
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    1 year ago

    Generally I’m a boomer shooter kinda guy, but I have recently been into more “chill in the world and ‘work’ on stuff” games like Satisfactory, Stardew Valley, Slime Rancher, Minecraft, etc

    But like you I also occasionally pick up a shorter, story driven game. Fire watch is one of the best games I have ever played.

  • iNeedScissors67@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    However many it takes to beat them. I typically don’t replay games, and I don’t play into those insane multiplayer games that require hundreds if not thousands of hours. I beat one, I move on. The only exceptions are NHL and MLB, I play those on Friday nights with some beers to decompress from the week so I have a disproportionate amount of hours in those, but I also don’t buy new ones every year; maybe every 4-5 years. I really bounce off of games that are too long or too big, though. No game needs to be 100 hours long. The last time I did one of those was Assassin’s Creed Odyssey and that’s the last time I’ll ever do that.

  • Thebazilly@pathfinder.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    I prefer a nice contained 25-30 hour game most of the time.

    That doesn’t stop me from having 700 hours in Total War: Warhammer II. But it takes a really special game to grab me for more than 60 or so hours.

  • dan96kid@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    The hours I dump into games varies wildly. Certain games, mainly Splatoon 2/3, Final Fantasy 14, Factorio, Satisfactory, and anything with a level editor I’ll happily dump hundreds of hours into. According to Steam, the game I dumped the most hours into as of this post is Distance, with the majority of that being spent in its level editor.

  • Nadya@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    I’ve been playing Runescape since grade school. I’m approaching a bit shy of 25,000 hours played (a little under 3 years). As an AFK’able “second monitor game” a good half of that is just “I’m at my computer anyway” but the other half is actual investment/more active playing.

    I don’t bother playing a game if I’m not going to invest a significant amount of time into it. I aim for 100% completion or reaching the top 0.1% of players if there is a competitive ranking system. It’s extremely rare for me to play a game that I don’t dump a minimum of 500 hours into.

    My play time is less now than it was when I was a teen but it’s still skewed towards the higher end due to me being fortunate enough to work from home with a FIFO queue of work. If my work is done - I can game during work hours if I want to. As long as I keep close tabs on my queue and handle anything as it comes in. This gives me 8~ hours of potential game time that I otherwise wouldn’t have. Since I need to be near my computer in case any work comes in - I’m pretty limited with activities I can do. I can lift some weights, browse the internet, cook a quick meal, or play video games. But I can’t really leave the house, go swim in the pool, etc.

    • Pekka@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      RuneScape is a great second monitor game, the game allows you to be very active when you want to and have time for that, chill semi-afk content when you also want to watch videos’ on the side, and even ‘click once every five minute’ style gameplay. I have a bit over 9000 hours on my ironman.

      After Runescape, my second most played game is definitely Minecraft, then Skyrim with about 550 hours, Fallout 4 with 300 hours and everything else is 115 hours or less.

  • birlocke_@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    The most hours I’ve ever put into a game (that wasn’t WoW pre-Cata) is 99 (Persona 5). My brain just can’t (or won’t) comprehend playing something for x-hundred/thousand hours even if I really enjoy it.

    • piece@feddit.it
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Same here, with the only exception of games I keep getting back to (basically my all-time favorites that I replay every few years) and games I drop and then decide to restart (and then drop, and restart, and drop, and restart).

      Recently I’ve been avoiding games that are more than 20-40 hours (doing main+some side quests) because I came to the conclusion that there’s no game longer than that that doesn’t have a bloated-to-deatb story or gameplay mechanics that feel more like a treadmill than a game.

  • VoxAdActa@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    Judging from my Elder Scrolls Online experience, it takes me about 175-200 days played to burn out on something I’m really into. But nothing else has really come close to that since I quit about a year ago. I’ve been kind of bouncing from game to game, got a couple hundred hours into Guild Wars 2, a hundred hours or so each on Grim Dawn and Diablo 3, a little less than a hundred on Vermintide 2. Basically, when I find a game that scratches an itch, I will play it until I’ve squeezed every drop of content from the bottle. And it looks like I’ll give a new game about a hundred hours to hook me, if I can get past the first hour or so.

    I kind of want to go back to ESO, but it’s 75% less fun for me without the subscription (the Craft Bag is BAE, and the DLCs are where I’d be spending my time), but I’m hesitating on the question of “Is it responsible of me to be spending $15/mo on a game I’ve already quit playing once?” And yet, nothing else has come close to hitting that mark for me. GW2 is really amazing, it’s got a lot of things I’d definitely miss if I went back to ESO, but… it’s not the same, somehow.

    • TimmyToucan@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      I’ve put it down and picked it back up 2 or 3 times; looking forward to starting Necrom tomorrow, but once that’s done I’ll it it down again I think.
      I think it’s generally an amazing game, but I don’t do much of the multiplayer content, so each time I’m away for 1.5 to 2 years to let content build up and get myself out of the grind.