• Meuzzin@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    Been using SoulSeek around 10 years. I’ve never had trouble finding what I’m looking for, a lot of it very obscure. Previous to the interwebs, I always had to special order CDs from England…

  • jozza@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    I think if you’re going to the trouble to amass a music library, you might as well use lidarr so you can be specific about the quality/releases you’re pulling in. I’ve used soulseek a few times over the years and there’s a lot of junk/low quality files in there. Even just inconsistently named or tagged. It’s not the end of the world but if you’re going to implement a system, might as well do it right.

    • rooster_butt@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      The biggest pain point that I have with Lidarr is that there is no integrated way to split flac/cue albums that are very prevalent. I really need the tracks split so they can be played via plexamp. If anyone has any suggestions to automate this relatively well, I would appreciate it.

      • jozza@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        I’m using lidarr and yet to find flac albums that aren’t already split. Everything plays on Plexamp for me without issue. What sources are you using?

    • minnix@lemux.minnix.devOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Where Nicotine/Soulseek excel is finding rare stuff that’s usually not distributed via torrent, similar to @[email protected] 's comment. Not only that, but friend lists, PMs, as well as browsing music shares from users that have similar interests and advanced filtering for format, bitrate, etc.

      A lot of my music collection was never even released on tape, much less CD or streaming, and dealing with Discogs and waiting for sellers to get in stock what you’re looking for is a hassle. If your tastes veer toward the more mainstream and official digital releases are available, then torrents may be better for you. For myself and others like me, the choice is pretty clear though.

      • jozza@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        For sure - if there’s no good quality or official copy of what you’re after, it makes sense that you’d take what you can get. Out of curiosity, what are you into?

    • fernandu00@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      I miss kazaa .still have the first thousand songs I downloaded with it… Id tags are terrible but I love to listen to them

  • Estinos@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    I’m not sure to get this. Is the point of the article to install Nicotine+ into docker just to download music on a server? That seems overkill, I would rather use Nicotine+ on my laptop, then rsync my Music directory to the server. That way I have backups, and I’m not limited to music coming from Soulseek. Bandcamp catalog is surprisingly complete, since a few years (relatively to 5-10 years ago, where it feels you were going to Bandcamp to listen to “Bandcamp artists”, like Jamendo), you can download drm-free tracks and it allows to support artists you like. And of course, you can also download music from youtube with yt-dlp, provided you spend some time to tag it if you care about that.