• yA3xAKQMbq@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Really, different countries are doing research on solid-state batteries, who’da thunk.

        What does that have to do with China allegedly being an „appropriation committee“?

        • chowder@lemmy.one
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          6
          ·
          1 year ago

          They just copied the Japanese breakthrough, what does that have to do with China copying things?

          • yA3xAKQMbq@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            Those two reports have literally nothing in common except the words „breakthrough“ and „solid-state batteries“, lol.

            You absolutely don’t understand anything at all, so please just stop talking. Thank you.

            • chowder@lemmy.one
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              7
              ·
              1 year ago

              Yeah beyond being about breakthroughs specifically about solid electrolytes, nothing in common. lol

              • yA3xAKQMbq@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                5
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                1 year ago

                good grief… 🤦‍♀️

                I mean you really do not have to know anything about this technology or even physics at all to understand that they’re working on completely different parts of that technology. How can anyone have reading comprehension skills that bad and still need to die on their little hill?

    • Varyk@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      7
      ·
      1 year ago

      Nobody said the Chinese are copying everything, but goodie for you for making up an argument that no one is making.

      You should read your own articles after you use Google - the largest problem with your inaccurately titled and researched article is that the conclusions of that single, uncorroborated and unconditional headline (it wasn’t really a study) is based purely on the number of articles published, not on any actual technology or world content. China is by far the largest publisher of pseudoscientific articles, and there is no regulation on the validity of the data presented in those articles. Chinese researchers admit to pushing out their articles at the expense of quality, and the people tasked with identifying the false data within those scientific articles are overwhelmed by the amount of false articles. The Chinese scientific community turns out. You can read about that here:

      https://www.almendron.com/tribuna/chinas-fake-science-industry-how-paper-mills-threaten-progress/

      They publish false articles using duplicate and fudged data. That’s not racist, that’s academically and scientifically damaging and Irresponsible.