• Veraticus@lib.lgbt
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    I know this, I just don’t think it matters. Our a priori assumption must be trans people should be included everywhere as much as possible, just like Black people or Jewish people. Fairness will adjust to our expectations, so everything will feel fine in the end, just as it did when we allowed other minorities to compete in leagues they were formerly barred from.

    • Chriskmee@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      How can it not matter? You have a sport built around the idea of fair competition to a genetic physical weakness, and you think we should just throw that all away? I’m not sure why you are bringing race and nationality into this discussion, that’s never been a race based disadvantage that we decided we needed to design sports around.

      Our a priori assumption must be trans people should be included everywhere as much as possible,

      I agree, but I think sports falls under “not possible” because they don’t meet the requirements for the women’s league. I have no problem with a trans league, or they are more than welcome to compete in the best of the best league. I don’t think they should be competing in women’s sports, it’s unfair to all biological women athletes who compete against other biological women athletes.

      And if you want to compare it to race, where the idea of a race segregated sport would be super controversial, let’s just get rid of women’s sports all together. Women are equal to men, right? They can do anything a man can do, right? What are we pretending women aren’t equal by putting them in their own sports leagues? Let’s just get rid of all women’s sports, let them compete directly with the men, and may the best win.

      • Veraticus@lib.lgbt
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        I’m fine sorting people by weight classes or hormone levels. But gender is not a useful way to do that and hasn’t been for years. The Olympics, for example, tests your hormone levels and not what your natal sex was or what your genitals look like.

        But ultimately I just don’t think sports matters more than peoples’ rights. So if we have to abolish gendered sports, especially below the ultra-professional level, I’m fine with that.

        And yes, people did indeed claim certain races had advantages in sports and pointed to science about muscle density to support their theories. They would consider themselves well-justified by Black people dominating certain sports. It is the same with trans athletes.

        • Chriskmee@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          But gender is not a useful way to do that and hasn’t been for years.

          So you are for getting rid of women’s sports, special Olympics, and everything in that realm and just letting everyone compete as people of the human race?

          But ultimately I just don’t think sports matters more than peoples’ rights.

          What rights? There is no right to compete in stuff you are not eligible for.

          So if we have to abolish gendered sports, especially below the ultra-professional level, I’m fine with that.

          So you are fine with women essentially never being competitive in sports? Personally I think it’s great they have their own league, because otherwise there wouldn’t really be women in sports.

          And yes, people did indeed claim certain races had advantages in sports and pointed to science about muscle density to support their theories. They would consider themselves well-justified by Black people dominating certain sports. It is the same with trans athletes.

          Except that they are competing in the open to everyone category, even if some races had an advantage, that’s legal in an open to everyone category. Women’s sports are not open to everyone, only to biological females who don’t take performance enhancing substances. Again, if you want to essentially remove women from sports by pretending biological males and females are the same, that’s your grave to dig.

          Race isn’t the same as gender, I’m hoping you realize that. In today’s world, gender is more a state of mind than anything else, race is not. I can choose to become the opposite gender, I can’t choose to be black as a white person.

          If trans athletes want to compete in sports, compete in the open to everyone league, don’t try to compete in leagues you don’t qualify for. Women’s sports, if they are to still exist, are for biological and non testosterone taking females only.

          • Veraticus@lib.lgbt
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            So you are for getting rid of women’s sports, special Olympics, and everything in that realm and just letting everyone compete as people of the human race?

            As I said, below the ultra-professional level, yes. Inside the ultra-professional level, gender tests are already not used to differentiate people into competition categories so they’ve already solved this problem. Read what I said in my previous post.

            even if some races had an advantage, that’s legal in an open to everyone category

            The point is it didn’t used to be. This was because people had research at the time showing that Black people had “higher muscle density” and other nonsense pseudoscience that they used to bar them from the “open to everyone categories.” Which, at the time, were not open to everyone, but only white people.

            Since you are just not understanding this: the same arguments used to prevent Black people from competing (they would dominate certain sports, their inclusion would make white people feel bad, their existence is basically the same as taking performance enhancing substances) are literally the same ones used to prevent trans people from competing. We decided those problems didn’t matter, and now, yes, Black people do win in certain sporting fields more. But everyone’s decided that’s okay.

            Literally the same thing will happen with trans people. I know you have this weirdly deep-seated need to believe in the fairness of sports, but fairness is a construction we apply to sports, not something inherent in them naturally. If we include trans people as much as possible, it will still feel fair, even if trans people (gasp) even sometimes win.

            In today’s world, gender is more a state of mind than anything else, race is not. I can choose to become the opposite gender, I can’t choose to be black as a white person.

            Gender is not “more a state of mind than anything else,” any more than sex (or race) is. Trans people are their actual genders, they aren’t pretending to be a man or woman for the day, any more than a Black person is pretending to be a white person or vice versa.

            Frankly, as I said at the beginning of this discussion, the entire sports argument is stupid though. The rights of an entire minority (yes, their rights) shouldn’t hinge on whether or not they can compete in sporting events, and every time trans liberation is brought up people whine “but what about fairness in sports?”

            You should find other stuff to care about, because the amount of trans athletes is vanishingly small and the amount of ink spilled on debating their inclusion with sports totally out-of-proportion to the “problem” itself.

            • Chriskmee@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              As I said, below the ultra-professional level, yes. Inside the ultra-professional level, gender tests are already not used to differentiate people into competition categories so they’ve already solved this problem.

              Why should we have separate categories at the ultra professional level only? It wasn’t until pretty recently that trans women trying to compete in women’s sports was even a thing, and I believe they do have some tests in certain competitions that would not allow trans women to compete.

              The point is it didn’t used to be. This was because people had research at the time showing that Black people had “higher muscle density” and other nonsense pseudoscience that they used to bar them from the “open to everyone categories.”

              That was also during a time where they were segregated from everything, right? Also, while that reasoning might have been BS, the reasoning for not allowing trans women in women’s sports isn’t. Biology isn’t BS, it’s science. Trans women have a biological and scientifically proven physical advantage over women from birth.

              Since you are just not understanding this: the same arguments used to prevent Black people from competing (they would dominate certain sports, their inclusion would make white people feel bad, their existence is basically the same as taking performance enhancing substances) are literally the same ones used to prevent trans people from competing.

              The reason behind the argument matters a lot. You are comparing racism backed arguments with scientifically backed ones. They aren’t the same argument, they are based on very different reasons.

              Gender is not “more a state of mind than anything else,” any more than sex (or race) is. Trans people are their actual genders, they aren’t pretending to be a man or woman for the day, any more than a Black person is pretending to be a white person or vice versa.

              What I meant is that gender is all in your head, sex and race are not. We should not define sports by what you say you are in your own head. When it comes to bathroom use, sure, base it on gender, aka what is in your head. When it comes to sports, we should use sex, not gender. I’m not trying to bash trans people here, I think they should be treated as the gender they identify with, and that is what I mean by gender being a state of mind, whereas sex is a biological state.

              Unlike gender though, where at some point after birth you can change it, you can’t change your race. One of these is physical, the other is mental.

              Frankly, as I said at the beginning of this discussion, the entire sports argument is stupid though. The rights of an entire minority (yes, their rights) shouldn’t hinge on whether or not they can compete in sporting events, and every time trans liberation is brought up people whine “but what about fairness in sports?”

              Right now everyone has the same rights, so you don’t lose it gain rights by switching genders. There is no right to compete in sports, so no right is lost by banning trans from women’s sports. Maybe you have a different definition of “rights” than the actual definition?

              Maybe trans liberation shouldn’t be fighting for stuff like inclusion in sports? There is such a thing as taking a movement too far. I’m all for fair treatment, access to healthcare, inclusion in society, etc. But when it comes to thinking trans women are exactly the same in every way to a biological woman, that’s just taking it too far and blatantly ignoring science. There are going to be times when we need to separate trans and biological women, and for the sake of fairness and the whole reason women sports what in the first place, trans women shouldn’t play in women’s sports.

              You should find other stuff to care about, because the amount of trans athletes is vanishingly small and the amount of ink spilled on debating their inclusion with sports totally out-of-proportion to the “problem” itself.

              Maybe trans people should find other stuff to care about besides inclusion in sports they aren’t eligible for. I also don’t see anything wrong with stopping a problem now before it becomes a bigger problem. Just look at climate change, how much better would it have been if instead of “it’s not an issue yet, no need to care about it” we actually did care about it many years ago? Personally I don’t like waiting for problems to become big problems before doing something.

              • Veraticus@lib.lgbt
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                3
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                1 year ago

                I mean, people thought Black people had biological differences that would prevent them from competing on an equal footing too. There was literally science about it, in the same way you claim there’s science about trans people. And indeed Black people do dominate certain sports right now. If you want sports to be perfectly fair how can you reconcile that?

                Because you’ve a priori agreed Black people competing is worth any amount of “unfairness” that results. The same will be true of trans people in the future.

                The rest of your post is honestly just pearl clutching about sports stuff that neither I nor anyone else truly cares about. Sports will get over trans inclusion; trans people are already being included, even in the Olympics, so the process is happening. And no cis athletes have been dispossessed yet. So… continue being unhappy about it if you like, the world is moving on and so am I.

                • Chriskmee@lemm.ee
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  I mean, people thought Black people had biological differences that would prevent them from competing on an equal footing too. There was literally science about it, in the same way you claim there’s science about trans people. And indeed Black people do dominate certain sports right now. If you want sports to be perfectly fair how can you reconcile that?

                  Black people dominate some sports IN THE BEST OF THE BEST DIVISIONS. Trans people are welcome to compete in that best of the best division.

                  Are you claiming there is no legitimate scientific provable advantage than trans women have over natural women in sports? Maybe there isn’t anything legitimate for black people, or maybe it’s a minor advantage present in some, but you can’t deny trans women retain significant advantages given they are biologically male.

                  Because you’ve a priori agreed Black people competing is worth any amount of “unfairness” that results. The same will be true of trans people in the future.

                  Trans can compete in the best of the best leagues like everyone else, yes. They shouldn’t compete in leagues based around biological disadvantage because they don’t have that biological disadvantage.

                  Sports will get over trans inclusion; trans people are already being included, even in the Olympics, so the process is happening

                  They are more than welcome to compete in the best of the best sports leagues, nobody is banning them from sports, just ones they don’t qualify for.

                  So… continue being unhappy about it if you like, the world is moving on and so am I.

                  I’m not unhappy about it really, I’m just fighting for equality is all, trying to keep things fair for everyone. I would be totally for a trans league, since they don’t qualify as biological women but probably aren’t good enough to compete at the best levels.

                  Just like how I don’t think able bodied people should compete in the special Olympics, I don’t think trans women should compete in biological women based sports, because it’s just unfair to women.

                  Let me ask you this, if we are to store trans women in women’s sports, should there be any limits? Can a male bodybuilder decide he is actually a women, then the next day go break records? Would you deny her entry, and if so why?

                  • Veraticus@lib.lgbt
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    3
                    ·
                    1 year ago

                    Are you claiming there is no legitimate scientific provable advantage than trans women have over natural women in sports?

                    Yes, and I am provably correct.

                    Literally trans people (including trans women!) are competing in Olympics events now. Because as I’ve said over and over again, gender tests are not based on natal sex but hormone levels.

                    If trans women had an advantage, they would be crushing their cis competition. But they are not: for example, Laurel Hubbard. Check her out: https://olympics.com/en/news/weightlifting-laurel-hubbard-transgender-three-failed-lifts-tokyo

                    You’ve just been watching too much South Park. No one is trying to do compete in opposite-gendered leagues that is not trans, and as I’ve been saying from the start this is just a red herring with regards to trans liberation.