The Court upheld many restrictions on the White House and Surgeon General’s office’s contacts with tech companies, finding that they ‘coerced’ platforms’ content decisions

WP gift article expires in 14 days.

https://ghostarchive.org/archive/E0sEO

    • MasterBuilder@lemmy.one
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      36
      ·
      1 year ago

      One where Republicans block all Democrat court appointments, then push through their candidates at high speed when Republicans are in control.

      What I can’t figure out is why the Democrats can’t use similar tactics successfully. This is how we got a Republican Supreme Court.

      Somehow they were able to stonewall Obama’s nominees for over a year, then pushed through conservative appointees fast enough to give us whiplash - legal problems be damned.

      • raccoona_nongrata@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        37
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Because many democratic politicians are very conservative and are in favor of things like austerity. There are more Manchins and Sinemas off in the wings, it’s just not efficient for them to out themselves if they already have someone designated to be the villain who will put a stop to any legilslation they’re not in favor of. They know that being pro-austerity is not popular with their base.

        It’s critical that people use a politician’s history and where they get their funding as the real measuring stick of how they will behave in office, not simply what they say or vote for when they know it won’t matter.

        https://www.opensecrets.org/ is a useful resource to research candidates and politicians. You can look up where their campaign funding comes from, get spending data of lobbying groups etc.

      • teawrecks@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        1 year ago

        What I can’t figure out is why the Democrats can’t use similar tactics successfully.

        “When I am weaker than you, I ask you for freedom because that is according to your principles; when I am stronger than you, I take away your freedom because that is according to my principles.”

    • missveeronica@lemmynsfw.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      So you’re okay with it being fine for a White House administration telling tech companies what they can and can’t allow? If so, then just wait until.the next Republican gets into the White House. You may not like this because it’s against Bidens White House, but this ruling will prevent Trump from doing it as well…if he somehow got back into office…which won’t happen, but still. It’s a precedent.

      • TwilightVulpine@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        15
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Since I know myself as a person, Public Service Announcements and accontability on public media are complelely normal. It’s only since the rise of internet media that has been created this attitude that tech companies can’t be expected to have any responsibilties.

        So, there can’t be regulations and public interests because the people opposing these things when they are needed could misuse them? It doesn’t seem like the problem is that, but just Republicans being consistently shitty and unhinged both ways. It’s not like they need precedent to be terrible anyway, they make and break whatever precedents that might suit them.

        Demanding that media cuts off health misinformation during a major health crisis is exactly the sort of thing that a government should do.

      • pkulak@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        1 year ago

        Is that what happened? Or did the White House point out Tweets that violated Twitter’s ToS, like any citizen or corporation could do.

      • MasterBuilder@lemmy.one
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        1 year ago

        We both know it won’t prevent them. They will just repackage their arguments to get the result they desire. For example, the supreme court appointments arguments.