During the trial it was revealed that McDonald’s knew that heating their coffee to this temperature would be dangerous, but they did it anyways because it would save them money. When you serve coffee that is too hot to drink, it will take much longer for a person to drink their coffee, which means that McDonald’s will not have to give out as many free refills of coffee. This policy by the fast food chain is the reason the jury awarded $2.7 million dollars in punitive damages in the McDonald’s hot coffee case. Punitive damages are meant to punish the defendant for their inappropriate business practice.

      • Dkarma@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        11 months ago

        Thanks for proving my point. There is no way quick contact with coffee even at 200 degrees can do this.

        This is caused by letting it sit. She could have taken her pants off and prevented burns this bad.

        • AnonTwo@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          11 months ago

          Old lady in a car gets coffee on her lap.

          No she fucking couldn’t. And even if she could you are grossly underestimating the damage of 16oz of 200 degrees coffee.

          All you’re doing is showing how much of a sociopath you are.

    • theangryseal@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      11 months ago

      The woman was 79 years old. Getting the pants on before her labia was fused together by intentionally overheated coffee was probably a fucking chore.

    • JackbyDev@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      11 months ago

      Listen, do this as a test, pour water a cup of water on your pants. See if your legs get wet. Better yet, heat it up or chill it (not enough to hurt yourself) and see how cold or warm your legs feel.

      • Dkarma@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        11 months ago

        False equivalent test. Yes ur legs will get wet. No u won’t get burns like u see in the pics. That’s my point. This would have been a minor scalding if she wouldnt have just sat there and had taken her pants off.

        • havokdj@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          11 months ago

          Dude, she was 79 years old and wearing jeans. You think she could just jump out of them in like 2 seconds? She’s in a fucking car in a drive through, you can’t even get out the drivers side door in those circumstanced.

        • JackbyDev@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          11 months ago

          You’d only get a light scalding because I’m telling you to not get near boiling water. I’m telling you to do this to see if your legs get wet and if you can still feel the temperature even if they somehow don’t.