When there is a heated, with a lot of strong and exaggerated arguments on both sides, and I don’t know what to believe, or I’m overwhelmed with the raw information, I look at Wikipedia. Or even something that is not a current event, but the information I found on the internet doesn’t feel reliable.

I’m sure some would find flaws there, but they do a good job of keeping it neutral and sticking to verifiable facts.

  • Aatube@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    11 months ago

    Found you! While he appears to be way more than a Russian troll, he was indeed very insulting in his edit summaries. The admin also appears to be an invested contributor to the article who merely coincided with this event; it seems they were merely resolving this discussion. Pending edits (ones that require approval) are separate from the usual edits people fly by.

    • cwagner@lemmy.cwagner.me
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      11 months ago

      it seems they were merely resolving this discussion.

      That was about more stuff that was unsourced in the same line, I guess CityOfSilver would have loved to keep that as well, they seem to hate sourced information. I didn’t remove that because I didn’t know enough about them. The case with Azov was because I actually had done some reading into them when the war started, so I had at least some cursory experience with them.