DENVER (AP) — The campaign to use the U.S. Constitution’s “insurrection” clause to bar former President Donald Trump from running for the White House again enters a new phase this week as hearings begin in two states on lawsuits that might end up reaching the U.S. Supreme Court.

A weeklong hearing on one lawsuit to bar Trump from the ballot in Colorado begins Monday, while on Thursday oral arguments are scheduled before the Minnesota Supreme Court on an effort to kick the Republican former president off the ballot in that state.

    • hansl@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      10 months ago

      Both the richest and poorest of people are equally prohibited from sleeping under a bridge.

      • dvoraqs@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        10 months ago

        A rich person could probably easily get a permit to do so and pay people to do anything needed for it

  • xia@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    10 months ago

    Trump might be terrible, but angering and disenfranchising half a country sounds like a bad idea.

    • Nougat@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      10 months ago

      Pretending that we can go back to “the way it was” is a worse idea. Republican American Fascist politics is now “do whatever you want and dare the world to stop you.” Every time they’re not stopped, they gain more power, and they get the message that they can do whatever they want again, except next time, a little worse. Lather, rinse, repeat.

      We can’t go back the way we came. The only way out is through.

    • Starshader@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      10 months ago

      Yeah, you don’t want to hurt a dangerous criminal’s feeling. At worst he only get to be the first US dictator.