• theshatterstone54@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    10 months ago

    Well, the definition of being vegan is eating plants only. The part about animal sufffering is a justification of being vegan.

    • Kaijobu@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      10 months ago

      Well, to be more precise, vegan stands for the lack of an animal’s influence in a product. This distinction is important as mushrooms/fungi are not categorised as simple plants, vegetables, fruits, legumes, nuts and so on.

      • lalo@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        10 months ago

        Lack on animal exploitation*. If you find a dead animal while dumpster diving or a roadkill and you bring home to eat, it’s vegan because you’re not contributing to the exploitation of living sentient beings.

        • dylanmorgan@slrpnk.net
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          10 months ago

          I would argue that roadkill is a product of human exploitation of the environment as a whole, so roadkill isn’t vegan.

          Also, if roadkill is vegan you know you’re going to get some psycho with a massive cow catcher on the front of his pickup who’s “vegan” because he only eats what he runs down in his truck.