• MammyWhammy@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    32
    ·
    1 year ago

    I see them as “diet” cars. Similar to if someone is trying to cut back on sodas, switching to diet sodas is a net benefit. That’s not to say diet sodas are good for you or remotely healthy, they’re just less bad than the alternative.

    • McSudds_@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      20
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Yeah, except the sweeteners they use to make diet sodas “diet” make those sodas just as bad, if not worse, than the originals. Which also works for the car analogy given the source of the energy most EVs use :/

      • tigerhawkvok@startrek.website
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        given the source of the energy most EVs use :/

        What? This is hilariously wrong.

        A profoundly filthy coal power plant has multimillion dollar filtration the size of your damn apartment. That gross coal is scrubbed more than the gasoline from any vehicle possibly could be.

        In a first world country it’s not possible to have an electric car as dirty per joule as a gas vehicle.

        Further, the powertrain is direct and therefore dramatically more efficient, so on a distance basis you get an additional multiplier. That’s where the EPA MPGe comes from - total energy content of 1 gallon of gasoline, converted to range on the electric vehicle.

        That’s about 33 kWh in one gallon, which is about half the total storage capacity of my Bolt EUV 2023 (65 kWh) which has about 240mi of range on a full charge, which is why the MPGe is ~120mi/gal, which for an equally polluting power source as a personal gas vehicle, is 5-6x cleaner. Public DC fast chargers are frequently exclusively renewably powered.

        It’s impressive because literally every possible angle of your statement is hilariously incorrect.