• SpaceMan9000@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      98
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      The bottom still suggest to tip… It’s not used to give their employees a better wage, it’s to show lower prices on the menus.

      • papertowels@lemmy.one
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        20
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        I actually interpreted that is tipping is now optional because the service charge goes to the staff

        • protist@mander.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          10
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          I agree, the tip at that point is entirely optional whereas without the service charge it would be expected. This seems no different than a “18% gratuity will be added to parties of 8 or more.”

        • jimbo@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          1 year ago

          the service charge goes to the staff

          Does it? Tips are legally protected and must go to staff, but I don’t think the same applies to “service charges”.

          • nogooduser@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            It says on the receipt that they use the service charge to post a higher wage so if that is true then it does (indirectly) go to the staff. Like you say though - there’s no guarantee that it all goes to the staff.

          • papertowels@lemmy.one
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            That’s how I interpreted the contents of the receipt, that’s all I can tell you.

          • phillaholic@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            This would reduce tipping a lot, so if the staff weren’t being paid well to begin with I don’t see how they’d continue working there.

      • Tb0n3@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        7
        ·
        1 year ago

        At the very least they’re calculating the tip from the pretax/pregratuity price. Most places seem to calculate the suggested tips from the after tax total. So they’re not complete scumbags. Only mostly scumbags.

    • ShortBoweledClown@lemmy.one
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      53
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Tips exist because servers were/are paid below minimum wage. A service charge should replace the tip, not be added on top of it. Or the restaurant should factor labor costs into the price of their meals. The owners are double dipping to shift the cost onto the consumer.

      • brygphilomena@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        53
        ·
        1 year ago

        Service charges are bullshit. Businesses need to advertise the full price of the food.

        Imo, this is simply unacceptable.

        • theneverfox@pawb.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          While we’re at it, how about we make the price on the label be the price you pay at the register across the board?

          Other countries don’t do this… The price is the price, no surprise sales tax or service charges. The way we do it is insane

          • brygphilomena@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            Our taxes in general would need an overhaul for this. City tax, county tax, state tax. There is a different tax rate on different products.

            I’m not against it, it’s just that the way the USA is organized with city, county, state, and federal hierarchies each able to levy taxes makes the implementation burdensome. Not impossible, but very difficult.

            • theneverfox@pawb.social
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              1 year ago

              Nope, not an issue. It’s easier even… You buy a frozen pizza, a bag of flour, and a case of beer. All three of those might have different taxes… You can add it up at the register, or you can add them separately when you print the price labels

              • brygphilomena@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                1 year ago

                That’s if stores are the ones printing the price labels. Many prices are printed by the manufacturer on the packaging. They can print a single price on their product and ship it across the nation. All stores need to do is put it out.

                • theneverfox@pawb.social
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  They used to, but I don’t think that’s a common thing anymore. The few things that still print the price, like certain candy and Arizona iced tea, have a separate price at most places I’ve seen lately

                  Even then, they could just factor it in… They would make less on each unit in more expensive states, but it is an option. I saw that in places when I lived in France - and everything ended in round numbers too, it makes shopping so much more pleasant

      • kent_eh@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Or the restaurant should factor labor costs into the price of their meals

        This is the answer.

      • WoefKat@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        Well too be fair the cost will always be borne by the consumer. After all if it comes out of the operator’s pocket they’ll just up the food prices.

        But that’s really what should happen because it makes the pricing clear for everyone and a salary for the waiters makes them have a decent income even when it’s quieter.

    • macarthur_park@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      1 year ago

      If they need to raise prices by 18% to pay their workers, then they need to actually raise the prices on the menu. Right now this is just bait and switch, it’s dishonest and possibly illegal depending on the location.