• Neshura@bookwormstory.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      10 months ago

      From my personal experience running GitLab and Forgejo (Gitea Drop-In replacement/Fork):

      • Gitea/Forgejo is easier to get running
      • UI is less bloated/faster
      • GitLab redesigned their UI and imo it’s shit now
      • No features locked behind a “Pro” Version (Pull or Bidirectional mirrors are for example unavailable on GitLab self-hosted unless you shell out for premium)
      • Gitea Actions is a lot more intuitive than GitLab CI, this is likely personal preference but it’s still an important factor
      • bionicjoey@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        10 months ago

        I have no experience with forgejo but I agree with all of the above in terms of gitea v gitlab

      • Fisch@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        10 months ago

        Definitely agree on the UI part. The UI of Gitea/Forgejo is very intuitive and easy to understand. When you go to a repository you just have the tabs to go to issues etc. and you can always see those at the top. The first time I used GitLab, I found it very unintuitive. There were 2 sidebars on the left side with their respective buttons right on top of each other. Issues and stuff are also in the sidebar, so I couldn’t find them immediately.

    • Neshura@bookwormstory.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      10 months ago

      It’s even possible to self-host. Afaik you don’t get to Self-Host GitHub unless you are a giant corporation.

      Edit: nvm I thought it said “GitHub”