• onlinepersona@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    6 months ago

    Guys, could you just stop buying Apple crap? They are just another big company that will do anything to make money, no matter how much they are already making. They don’t care about consumers’ rights and would probably rather they were done away with. Giving Apple money is just giving the big bully money.

    CC BY-NC-SA 4.0

    • Soleil@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      6 months ago

      Every company you can buy a smartphone from is “another big company that will do anything to make money, no matter how much they’re already making.” This is an issue with capitalism, not just inherently Apple. Don’t fault people for using the tool that works best for what they’re doing.

      • onlinepersona@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        6 months ago

        I can and will fault them. Not every company you can buy a smartphone from is big. FairPhone exists, Murena exists, and if you look around you’ll probably find more.

        And even if you absolutely have to buy from a big brand, there’s no need to give that money to the richest company on the planet.

        CC BY-NC-SA 4.0

    • astraeus@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      6 months ago

      I just bought a MacBook because I’ve been trying to do Linux for work but there are some things that just don’t work and I’m not interested in Windows. I’m turning into an Apple bro, someone help me.

      • novibe@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        6 months ago

        It really doesn’t matter… there is no ethical consumption under capitalism. Just use what’s more practical or better in any way for you.

        • onlinepersona@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          6 months ago

          That’s a cop out. If you make no effort, then of course nothing will change. You can look for brands that try to be ethical like FairPhone or Fair Trade brands. If all you do keep buying from the biggest, baddest brands out there, well, you’re part of the problem. They wouldn’t be rich without people like you.

          CC BY-NC-SA 4.0

          • novibe@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            edit-2
            6 months ago

            There are no “good” brands under capitalism. The issue is not of the moral failing of individual companies. We can’t solve the issues of capitalism by “consuming” right.

            You think fairphone have no slave-labour rare-earth metals in them?

            • onlinepersona@programming.dev
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              6 months ago

              Riddle me this: can flawed being create a perfect system?

              Also, is your “solution” to living in an evil, capitalistic society being a consumer of the biggest capitalistic brands?

              You think fairphone have no slave-labour rare-earth metals in them?

              Everything is black and white? There’s no in-between? Fairphone is thus as bad as Apple?

              CC BY-NC-SA 4.0

              • novibe@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                edit-2
                6 months ago

                It doesn’t matter if they are “bad” or not bro. The issue is the system. And it’s not a matter of morality. I don’t give a fuck if it’s “evil” or “good”. Even in a perfect capitalist world where all companies were “fair”something, we would still be destroying the planet with climate change and exploiting the labour of people in the third-world.

                And who cares about “perfect”? I only care about meaningful change that helps not destroy the planet. Buying a fairphone is not it.

                The only thing that will help is a fucking revolution. So the BEST thing any of us can do is to radicalise those around us and organize.

                • moomoomoo309@programming.dev
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  6 months ago

                  I think that is a useless mental model. It doesn’t help you make decisions except those that lead to revolution. The person you’re replying to is trying to point that out. If I want to buy a phone, which should I buy? Your rhetoric says “whichever one will lead to revolution”, which really isn’t helpful.

                • onlinepersona@programming.dev
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  6 months ago

                  The only thing that will help is a fucking revolution. So the BEST thing any of us can do is to radicalise those around us and organize.

                  First you need to know what kind of a system you’d want. Second, revolution is a big big goal. Small steps.

                  I only care about meaningful change that helps not destroy the planet. Buying a fairphone is not it.

                  And buying Apple is? Fairphone is trying to do something good. Their entire goal is to try to do good. Apple is just out here making fat stacks with “good” being more stacks. They pretend they’re pro-privacy, pro-climate, pro-whatever, but it’s all bullshit.

                  CC BY-NC-SA 4.0

  • originalfrozenbanana@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    6 months ago

    “You don’t need to use us for payments but you still need to pay us for the payments we had nothing to do with” is perfectly monopolistic

      • Bobby Byrne@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        6 months ago

        Taxes contribute to providing services and infrastructure to the people. This takes money from the people and deposits it into the bank accounts of the wealthy. I see two very different things.

    • scorpionix@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      6 months ago

      Well, they do provide the AppStore and the whole underlying infrastructure. So a fee in and off itself is not unreasonable.

      However, since the AppStore is the only channel for selling/downloading apps it reeks of monopoly (which Apple is rightly being investigated for).

      • Michal@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        6 months ago

        It is unreasonable if they are not the one providing payment infra.

        They already charge developers 100$ pa for the app store account. If that doesn’t cover their costs, they can increase it, but going after 3rd party payments is pure greed.