For the past few years, a growing number of users, analysts, and experts raised alarms about a truth that feels obvious to a lot of people who surf around in web browsers: the quality of Google results is in serious decline. Google disagrees.
For the past few years, a growing number of users, analysts, and experts raised alarms about a truth that feels obvious to a lot of people who surf around in web browsers: the quality of Google results is in serious decline. Google disagrees.
What are those? DDG, Bing, Ecosia etc. are all not really better than Google. I haven‘t tried Kagi yet, mostly because it costs money.
You can actually try kagi for free. 100 searches/month should be enough for you to decide if it’s worth the money to you.
(Not affiliated; just a happy user)
I’m going to give Kagi a try, thanks to this comment - I didn’t know there was a free trial.
Kagi went to bed with Brave, and when people protested they ignored it
Is kagi a metasearch engine? Or does it have its own crawler and so on?
It’s a mix I believe: https://help.kagi.com/kagi/search-details/search-sources.html
That’s kinda stretching the definition of ‘went to bed’. Brave is one of the result providers you can select as a source, and that’s about it
I am actually kinda ok with DDG, but the results are… not always very great and the second page is filled with weird websites related to my location…
Maybe i should try both Kagi and Searx
Kagi went to bed with Brave, and when people protested they ignored it
What do you mean with “went to bed”?
DDG is on pair with google, that’s enough for me. (in some topics far better and in some far worse)
Not for international (non-English) results.
This is 100% true, no contest.