Context: I’m a second year medical student and currently residing in the deepest pit in the valley of the Dunning-Kruger graph, but am still constantly frustrated and infuriated with the push for introducing AI for quasi-self-diagnosis and loosening restrictions on inadequately educated providers like NP’s from the for-profit “schools”.

So, anyone else in a similar spot where you think you’re kinda dumb, but you know you’re still smarter than robots and people at the peak of the Dunning-Kruger graph in your field?

  • collapse_already@lemmy.mlEnglish
    9·
    10 months ago

    I have graduated to the stage of my career where I believe “I have to teach these kids how to do things correctly before my coworkers corrupt them, or they learn bad behaviors on their own.” I was thrown in the fire early in my career and am trying to be the mentor I wish I had. I know where my knowledge gaps are, but generally know who to rely on. I definitely generate the most value when I stick to my expertise, but I still try to learn more whenever possible.

    I should remember this crap for my next self-evaluation (I hate that crap).

    • the_third@feddit.de
      3·
      10 months ago

      I don’t think self evaluation should ever be honest or related to reality. It’s mainly an engineering problem where you build a set of answers to satisfy the requirements of an unknown set of requirements.

      • Suppoze@beehaw.org
        2·
        10 months ago

        Yeah. You just have to be aware of how others percieve you and just write that. Your percieved strengths and weaknesses and all that. In no way do you have to actually evaluate yourself as a person.