I’m looking for a wiki solution (either remotely hosted or self-hosted is fine) that takes Markdown input.

Thanks.

  • NuclearArmWrestling@lemmy.world
    9·
    1 year ago

    I’m a big fan of Bookstack. The Docker images work great, also in Kubernetes. SSO is easy to set up as well, so if you’re using something like Authentik for SSO, you can integrate it pretty easily.

    • kentucky444@eslemmy.es
      3·
      1 year ago

      I researched using Bookstack but you can access the pictures even if you do not have an account and have the right URL, anybody can see the picture/attachment file in any browser.

      Not having well-implemented access control was a big No No for us.

    • tjhart85@kbin.social
      3·
      1 year ago

      I love Bookstack!

      The diagram tool can be used to markup anything. Besides the obvious, I’ve also put pictures as the background and then marked up those to diagram out some work I was doing around the house.

      I hope the dev makes his way over here, he was very active on Reddit.

  • naeap@sopuli.xyz
    8·
    1 year ago

    I’m currently hosting a wiki.js
    you can either use markdown or a visual editor

    • kentucky444@eslemmy.es
      2·
      1 year ago

      My only gripe with wiki.js was the use of SQL for local storage. My wiki must be future proof and locking myself in an obscure SQL database was the deal breaker. I know that you can sync with a Git repo, but it felt like an overkill.

    • kentucky444@eslemmy.esEnglish
      4·
      1 year ago

      +1 Dokuwiki. It is a little complicated than most to configure the first time, but once you have everything running, it will work without complaints. Also, the whole wiki is stored as plain text files, which is awesome for backups.

      • xohshoo@lemmy.worldEnglish
        2·
        1 year ago

        piling on for Dokuwiki. Have been running it personally and for an org (2 different wikis) for like 7 or 8 years. No problems, and it’s own syntax is pretty easy too. I’ve migrated a few times too and love that it’s just plain text files

    • Dialectic Cake@lemmy.world
      1·
      1 year ago

      I switched from Tiddlywiki to Logseq 3-4 months ago and LOVE Logseq.

      Part of the reason I didn’t like Tiddlywiki was it kept everything in a single html file (including embedded images – eww) which made it annoying to move information around. (Note there is an option to run your own server which gives you extra flexibility, but I wasn’t interested in doing that.)

      With Logseq, it’s separate markdown file per journal entry / wiki page. I like the addons that are available as well as the queries, e.g., {{query (todo doing)}} displays my do now tasks on my journal page.

      Here’s a Beginner’s Guide on how to use LogSeq: YouTube video by Keep Productive

  • whitehatbofh@lemmy.world
    71·
    1 year ago

    You could always just use a github repo as a wiki. It would render markdown pages in your browser, and it comes with built in version control!

  • Smash@lemmy.self-hosted.site
    5·
    1 year ago

    wikijs comes to mind, it’s deploy-able with a single docker command:

    docker run -d \
--name=wikijs \
--restart=unless-stopped \
--publish 8080:3000 \
--env "DB_TYPE=sqlite" \
--env "DB_FILEPATH=/wiki/db.sqlite" \
--volume wikijs:/wiki \
--volume wikijs:/wiki/data/content \
ghcr.io/requarks/wiki:2
    • festus@lemmy.ca
      2·
      1 year ago

      I also self-host WikiJS and am quite happy with it. FYI though if you’re setting it up I’d instead configure it to use Postgres as the database, as I recall reading that they’re planning on removing SQLite support at some point. Unfortunately though that does mean you lose a one-liner like this.

  • glacials@l.twos.dev
    5·
    1 year ago

    Obsidian is a fantastic note taking app that focuses on cross-linked notes, so is effectively a personal wiki.

    It has a paid add on that lets you publish it to a website, or you can just do it yourself since the files are all Markdown.