• Daft_ish@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        15
        ·
        edit-2
        5 months ago

        Your game is only inclusive if you can change genders mid game???

        Fuck me if I were a game designer and had to consider every audience who might be offended by any design decision.

        Insert meme “chess is ablist because it requires too much concentration.”

        • KeenFlame@feddit.nu
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          5 months ago

          Hello, game designer here. We don’t worry a lot about pc gender as it is mechanically agnostic, and as a feature it has a minimal effort involved with such a design decision. We do however consider who we offend at every stage of the development, and who we appeal to at every turn. The insane plethora of game enjoyers being incredibly different in tastes, styles and ability takes up most of the work of being a designer

          • pinkdrunkenelephants@lemmy.cafe
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            5 months ago

            Honestly, it’s always better to just have customizable characters as a default if it’s possible specifically for this reason.

      • Klear@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        5 months ago

        Inclusitvity is being able to play as either gender. Being able to switch mid-game is just a niche convenience thing. Personally I haven’t ever felt the need to switch during a playthrough, if the game is good, I wouldn’t mind starting a new one, but obviously there’s nothing wrong with having the option.

      • Gabu@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        5 months ago

        The inclusivity of *checks notes* swapping your ingame model for literally no benefit