BarqsHasBite@lemmy.world to Star Trek@startrek.websiteEnglish · 10 months agoWhy didn't the Vidiians harvest animal parts? Like cows, pigs, whatever their society had.message-squaremessage-square42fedilinkarrow-up122arrow-down12file-text
arrow-up120arrow-down1message-squareWhy didn't the Vidiians harvest animal parts? Like cows, pigs, whatever their society had.BarqsHasBite@lemmy.world to Star Trek@startrek.websiteEnglish · 10 months agomessage-square42fedilinkfile-text
minus-squareThenThreeMore@startrek.websitelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3·10 months agoAnd yet I’m DS9 Bashir says that murdering a clone of yourself is still murder. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ But maybe that was Bayorian law.
minus-squareFaceDeer@kbin.sociallinkfedilinkarrow-up2·10 months agoIf I had to make it make sense, Riker killing those clones might have been different because the clones weren’t “awakened” yet.
minus-squareThenThreeMore@startrek.websitelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3·10 months agoThat works. So it’s abortion not murder.
minus-squareThunderclapSasquatch@startrek.websitelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·10 months agoThe cut off is if the clone is aware, long as it’s a vegetable in a tube you can do whatever
And yet I’m DS9 Bashir says that murdering a clone of yourself is still murder. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ But maybe that was Bayorian law.
If I had to make it make sense, Riker killing those clones might have been different because the clones weren’t “awakened” yet.
That works. So it’s abortion not murder.
The cut off is if the clone is aware, long as it’s a vegetable in a tube you can do whatever