No matter if you feel the price tag is too high, or feel it’s a gimmick that won’t appeal to many, the Vision Pro will usher in a new era of apps and products.

To me, this is similar to when the iPhone was getting ready to be released. Many said it was expensive, had no keyboard, was too big and wide to be comfortably held, and would never sell. That all started to change once people got their hands on the device.

I feel that the Vision Pro will have the same effect, but this is one device you’ll truly need to test out and experience. Based on those that have been fortunate enough to actually use it, it’s not a gimmick.

  • spacecowboy@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    10 months ago

    I had a phone in my pocket before the iPhone came out. It was quite similar. It replaced an existing item that had room for improvement.

    These goggles are not replacing or upgrading anything.

    Not saying it’s a bad product but I disagree with your take on it being similar to the iPhone. It’s too niche and too expensive.

        • Zoolander@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          10 months ago

          I think you’re forgetting how much the iPhone cost compared to the other phones of the time (and some that were even free with service). Now, no one thinks twice about spending $600 on a smartphone.

            • Zoolander@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              10 months ago

              Your previous statement would suggest otherwise. It was something that was said verbatim about the iPhone.

              • spacecowboy@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                10 months ago

                The iPhone cost 499$ in 2007. The Motorola RAZR cost 600$ in 2004.

                The device wasn’t expensive, the plans were.

                • Zoolander@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  10 months ago

                  The iPhone was $499 with a subsidy from AT&T. The RAZR had no such subsidy and could be bought without a contract or even from eBay. Even the most expensive “smartphones” on the market didn’t need a subsidized price. The device absolutely was expensive. You’re trying to revise history.

    • oakey66@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      10 months ago

      And they are not filling a void. The beautiful part of the iPhone was that it made it possible for someone to have a full fledged computer in your pocket with access to the internet. This is tethering you more to your space. The applications are limited. Do I need to see an avatar in my FaceTime call? No. It’s hard to see a scenario where this has utility outside of the things that a new iPhone can do.

      • AA5B@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        10 months ago

        There’s a void in how geeky you can be playing Pokémon Go …. Although seriously …. I wouldn’t buy them for that purpose but I really want to try that

        • thorbot@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          9 months ago

          It wouldn’t work. The windows anchor to a fixed point. You’d just walk away from the Pokemon go app window. You can pinch and carry the windows with you but wouldn’t be able to interact with it