• MrJameGumb@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    30
    ·
    9 months ago

    *to

    Using “too” with two O’s makes it mean either “stab you excessively death” or “stab you also death” lol

    • lugal@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      9 months ago

      POV: It doesn’t matter if you use one or too O’s. This is a free country

      • MrJameGumb@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        13
        ·
        9 months ago

        It does too matter! It changes the meaning of the entire sentence from one thing to another! I don’t think my comment is asking too much here…

          • MrJameGumb@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            9 months ago

            To much? You want me to go somewhere called “Much”? Where is that? Is it a website or something?

            Or perhaps you’re suggesting that I transition to a state of “muchness”? I’m afraid I don’t know how to go about that…

            • lugal@sopuli.xyz
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              9 months ago

              To much: I much, you much, it muches, we much, you much, they much, I muched, …

              It’s a verb, stupid

              • MrJameGumb@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                5
                ·
                9 months ago

                Well, there’s no need to be rude! I was just trying to make a point! If our roles were reversed you’d probably do the same thing too!

                Gosh, sometimes this site is just too much…

                • lugal@sopuli.xyz
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  9 months ago

                  Well, the roles will never be reversed because I don’t correct people for minor typos. This is the internet, no need for proof reading, it just makes people look bad and doesn’t add anything to the conversation

  • Uriel238 [all pronouns]@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    9 months ago

    Capitalism breeds profit-maximizing innovation which is not the same as product-quality innovation.

    Early on this meant fins on your boxy car and special clappers in your car door to make them sound more rugged when they’re slammed closed.

    Later on innovation meant creative ways to bribe elected officials so they’d refuse to pass safety laws, or allow for effective law suits when too many people died horribly from collisions.

    It meant pressuring officials to pass laws requiring so much parking per retail location that cities automatically became a sprawl that required everyone have a personal vehicle.

    And innovation included bunches of ways to stay pollution control measures while they were resisted in the federal courts. In the meantime I was choking on smog every day in hazy Los Angeles.

    When we finally got cars that produced less soot and carbon monoxide, capitalist innovation meant automotive computers that detected when they were being smog checked and would fake being within limits (looking at you, Volkswagon).

    Oh and of course capitalist innovation included the suppression of reports on the effects of greenhouse gasses on climate, until it became a crisis, and a major population correction in the next century is inevitable. (Efforts we make now to fix it are all damage control.)

    • TankovayaDiviziya@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      9 months ago

      Later on innovation meant creative ways to bribe elected officials so they’d refuse to pass safety laws, or allow for effective law suits when too many people died horribly from collisions.

      If libertarians could read, they’d blame the government as usual.

      But seriously, I can’t count the number of times they always blame the government for merely existing for being bribed. Like, what is that even supposed to mean? I don’t follow the logic. You’re not supposed to offer bribes to the government in the first place or you even give one when asked, you bloody bollocks!

  • umbrella@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    edit-2
    9 months ago

    capitalism INbreeds innovation until you are paying subscriptions for everything.

  • Vespair@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    9 months ago

    You shouldn’t do that; that’s too much death.

    You should only stab somebody with an appropriate amount of death to kill them; anything beyond that is just excessive death