I always thought of it like this: if a workplace makes you feel devalued or is toxic (gaslighting and ranting about you behind your back), you quietly find new pastures.

Now, however, I think this is the wrong approach: why do I have to accept they bully me? I should defend myself. And doesn’t the manager have to make sure a workplace ain’t toxic? Instead of quietly looking for a new job next time this happens, wouldn’t it be better to confront, document and escalate instead of letting it go? even if HR only exists to protect the company and not me.

If HR and manager do nothing to address the problem, wouldn’t it be a better strategy to start working the least possible and let the company fire me, while looking for another job?

  • AstridWipenaugh@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    23
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    4 months ago

    HR exists to protect the company. When you raise a problem to them, you are the one responsible for the problem being put on record. This means you are the problem. Even if you go to HR and they do something about it, you still lose because your coworkers will steer clear of you for being a narc and any chance at a career is pretty much gone. Either work the problem out with your coworkers yourself, ignore it and keep your head down, or find a new job.

    • haui@lemmy.giftedmc.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      4 months ago

      I agree with the HR department but calling someone a narc for raising an issue of bullying is called victimblaming.

      I‘ve pulled tons of money out of companies for being bullied since they are responsible for keeping the workplace secure. Being a minority and bullied for it is great reason to sue and should be done in that case.

      This advice is essentially „be a good little *** and take it in stride“. I cant believe that its upvoted so heavily.