If so, then why?

  • OlPatchy2Eyes@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 month ago

    Yes, and it’s important that felons be able to run for president. Were that not the case, a corrupt enough system could just disqualify anyone that would seek to oust it.

      • Pronell@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 month ago

        Actually the thought is if the government can just imprison you to stop your candidacy, they have too much power.

        Thus they can continue to run.

        • dependencyinjection@discuss.tchncs.deOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          1 month ago

          I would say just don’t break any laws then, but laws can change and people are terrible.

          Edit: Pretty sure you’re all downvoting a misunderstanding.

          I’m saying I get why it’s a thing because people would convict their opponents. Not that I was actually saying well don’t break any laws.

    • Sean@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      If a convicted felon loses their right to vote, they should not be allowed to run for president.

      • hperrin@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 month ago

        The Constitution doesn’t do that, that’s up to the states. Also, you don’t have to be eligible to vote to be the president. The US Constitution outlines the only eligibility requirements for the president.