floofloof@lemmy.ca to Technology@lemmy.mlEnglish · 2 months agoAI Image Generator Avoids Copyright Issues by Training on Corrupted Photospetapixel.comexternal-linkmessage-square4fedilinkarrow-up10arrow-down10
arrow-up10arrow-down1external-linkAI Image Generator Avoids Copyright Issues by Training on Corrupted Photospetapixel.comfloofloof@lemmy.ca to Technology@lemmy.mlEnglish · 2 months agomessage-square4fedilink
minus-squaregrue@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·2 months agoThat’s not how any of this works. Copyright is a legal concept, not a technological one. You can’t strip the copyright off something by deleting part of it; the result is still a derivative work.
minus-squareHawk@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·2 months agoIt’s not what the paper is about at all, seems this is just shit journalism again. All the paper says about copyright is that this method is more secure because AI can sometimes spit out training examples.
minus-squarebitfucker@programming.devlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·2 months agoWhy… why is it more secure? Does it mean AI training is actively abusing copyright law? And this is more secure because they can hide it better?
That’s not how any of this works. Copyright is a legal concept, not a technological one. You can’t strip the copyright off something by deleting part of it; the result is still a derivative work.
It’s not what the paper is about at all, seems this is just shit journalism again.
All the paper says about copyright is that this method is more secure because AI can sometimes spit out training examples.
Why… why is it more secure? Does it mean AI training is actively abusing copyright law? And this is more secure because they can hide it better?