• TMP_NKcYUEoM7kXg4qYe@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 months ago

      Garuda advertises a different scheduler so I would think that would make difference. It’s also one of the things people recommend to improve gaming performance on Linux. Unfortunately as others have pointed out without 1% lows, there is nothing of value in this video. Saying that with respect to Nick. He should step up his game in this area. Average fps just doesn’t tell anything, especially on Linux which is even less consistent than Windows

    • Static_Rocket@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      Some of them advertised specific performance improvements.

      I’m not going to rag on them though. Some of them did have performance improvements and basically created the tools and optimized defaults that propagated to standard distros, allowing the gap to close.

  • yala@discuss.online
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    Unfortunately, I can’t take this seriously as 1% lows and additional variance due to difference in DE haven’t been accounted for.

    Furthermore, you bet that Tuxedo OS has done a splendid job at optimizing performance on a device that’s sold by Tuxedo. Therefore, I wonder if it’s even a fair comparison to begin with.