PugJesus@lemmy.world to 196@lemmy.blahaj.zoneEnglish · edit-22 months agoFounding Party rulelemmy.worldimagemessage-square58fedilinkarrow-up1446arrow-down10file-text
arrow-up1446arrow-down1imageFounding Party rulelemmy.worldPugJesus@lemmy.world to 196@lemmy.blahaj.zoneEnglish · edit-22 months agomessage-square58fedilinkfile-text
minus-squarekamenLady.@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up6·2 months ago55 attendees - i would assume these 55 plus their aides.
minus-squareDagwood222@lemm.eelinkfedilinkarrow-up8·2 months agoThat’s my assumption as well, but I don’t know what the protocol for this type of affair would have been. I was also thinking that there might also have been ‘female companionship’ provided.
55 attendees - i would assume these 55 plus their aides.
That’s my assumption as well, but I don’t know what the protocol for this type of affair would have been.
I was also thinking that there might also have been ‘female companionship’ provided.