I’m personally crossing my fingers for Discord.

    • jimmyjoners@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Yeah only way I see it working is if it’s more of a peer to peer / torrenting concept. As in while you use it, you are “seeding” other videos / content as well.

        • naeap@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          I recently stumbled over Odysee and am not exactly sure where to put them category wise. they are a federated service as well, aren’t they?

          • yistdaj@pawb.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            No, Odysee/LBRY operates on blockchain/crypto. It aims to be decentralised, and in that sense it’s bit like federation, but it’s completely different.

        • Pigeon@beehaw.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          Does the seeding work in a personally easily controllable way, e.g. you only see the videos you watch and allow it to seed? I’m not super familiar with torrenting beyond the very basics, let alone however this might differ.

          I’m thinking here mainly of making sure people aren’t just generally seeding everything in a way that would potentially make people unknowingly/unintentionally seed / party to any distribution of child abuse materials, snuff, revenge porn, or so on.

      • teawrecks@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        And then you run into the challenge of moderation.

        If it’s possible to be handed random videos to seed that you’ve never watched, criminals would take advantage of that to upload illicit content that no one wants hosted…

        It may only work to seed videos that you’ve explicitly whitelisted. Ex. Maybe “liking” the video also automatically volunteers some of your bandwidth to seed it. But then you will still open yourself up to legal disputes from copyright trolls. Just like YT, they would still be able to go around spamming C&Ds at everyone, and who is going to have time or money to fight it? Most would just take the video down immediately.

        And that’s all assuming that exposing your IP directly to the public doesn’t leave you vulnerable.

        On top of all of that, one of YT’s biggest values is that you can view most content in a browser while not logged in. Which I’m guessing is where a huge number of views come from. The core users would just be footing the bill for a bunch of freeloaders. But assuming everything else is solved, maybe it’s worth the tradeoff…?

    • amki@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      I internetted in a time where sharing an audio file was a real undertaking, maybe with better infrastructure the size of video won’t be a problem.

      Maybe it’s me being short-sighted but I don’t see video going far beyond 8k for almost all applications.