• cstine@lemmy.uncomfortable.business
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    1 year ago

    Came here to say this. Open source isn’t a noble crusade, and developers are not monks with vows of poverty.

    Until we get unlimited gay space communism, people will always take the money and avoiding that truth and acting shocked when they do at least listen to the people with unlimited money will always lead to disappointment.

    • Azure@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 year ago

      as true as this is, it means the developers are the ones with more power to stop things being taken over, and clearly as you said, they won’t.

      truth is it means you can’t trust open source devs who touch with for-profit money at all, they’re all as corpo and crooked and are willing to sell everyone out for themselves.

      • cstine@lemmy.uncomfortable.business
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        1 year ago

        I was trying to be a little kinder, but yeah, that’s my general opinion.

        It’s one reason I like code that’s actually owned by a foundation/organization that has all that pesky oversight and meetings and politicking because it makes things MUCH harder to be unilaterally sold out from under their users: it DOES happen, but it’s not just writing a check to one guy and hey presto next week your shit is broken/infested with malware/vanishes without a trace.

        They have their own problems and require funding to actually operate as intended, but it’s at least a layer between the ‘I made this’ meme and the users of the software.