That’s so punk-core.

They aren’t great, but they aren’t totally useless either. I met my amazing fiance through one, but I had to wade through a ton of shit first.

You say that something may replace IP4, but it won’t be IP6, then you list a lot of reasons why it can’t be IP6, except all those reasons would apply to whatever that something is also.

I’m going to make that paper so fucking sad that it’ll need therapy for life.

I look in the mirror when I have a specific mirror in mind when I say it. Otherwise it’s a mirror.

Bring a wet towel inside the car? Are you mad?!

I posted several large wood working machines for sale there in the past year and every one was bought within 24 hours.

When did that happen? I sold several pieces of woodshop equipment there in the past year and didn’t pay anything.

Tell that to Fedora that keeps resetting the Firefox homepage back to a Fedora news site.

I am altering the meme. Pray I do not alter it any further.

The bottom right is a reflection on the water of the wall at the top right.

I haven’t been able to get Vectric Aspire to work yet, even under wine. It’s used to layout tool paths for CNC operations, so it may be a little on the niche side, but it’s pretty popular there.

Both are correct.

A completely hairless man.

Every time I’ve messed with chain mail it’s always felt like it’s ripping out my body hair. This looks like torture.

The distro should be testing the driver within their update system before including it in their repo. The package should include metadata about system settings that could potentially break the system.

Yeah. Why would anyone expect one of the most popular video cards in the world to work in Linux. Those idiots.

Just to be clear. I understand why a proprietary card may not work. It isn’t Linux’s responsibility to make it work. However, what isn’t acceptable is for the automated update system of an OS to break a working system. Proprietary driver or not. The update system should have thrown up some very strong warnings that proceeding would break the system.

Regardless of the privacy issues, if this is actually a default feature of this machine, why does the camera hole look like it was put there with a hammer?

They can take out loans with the stocks as collateral. The money received from loans isn’t taxable.

Knowing that you can order checks with any number you want printed in them. I would trust it as much as i would trust a check with any other number. Maybe actually a little more than check #69420 or #58008.