Raping? You think farmers are raping their cows? That’s the hysteria I was referring to earlier.

Vegans find a talking point that causes them to upset themselves and demands everyone else see it from their perspective. It’s emotionally manipulative at best.

Personally, I find it hilarious how you’ve upset yourself over imagined grievances. Watching a new religion being created in real time is fascinating. Dogma forming and shifting to fill the voids of logic. Sociologically, amazing.

There also aren’t a billion pigs in the world. Billions of chickens, yes. Billions of cows, yes. Around three quarters of a billion pigs.

Your inability to do some basic research on your position is incredible. Feelings over facts. Emotions over reason. Project these failings in the other.

To be clear, that’s a yes on genocide, cloaked by eugenics.

I can only assume you view farmers has evil since they are the ones breeding these animals.

You believe all farm animals are treated poorly and spend their lives suffering or are willing to genocide them all because some are based on information that either you cherry picked or was cherry picked for you. Likely the later

You belief without doubt these animals would rather not exist than be born. That alone more closely aligns you with “the wrong side of history” – I am unaware of any reports on animals mass suiciding so I’m guessing they are happier than humans, who coincidently commit suicide a large rates…maybe we should cull that herd instead, they are the ones responsible for deforesting the Amazon. I know you’d rather blame the existence of animals but I’m not aware of any cows reasonable for cutting down trees.

The reality is that you care more about how these animals make you feel than how they feel. You’ve clearly never asked a pig if it wanted to die.

You may be surprised to know that if you were to chase a pig with knife while calmly explaining it’s what’s best for her, she would be content to trample you rather than accept your mercy killing for being of a sullied bloodline.

Difference being if we end animal husbandry Earth simply won’t have those animals anymore. More a genocide really.

How many draft horse does the average farmer have now that we have tractors?

Once we lose or reduce these genetic lineages, there is no going back.

Vegans want to pretend they are protecting animals but they aren’t, their ideas result in a less genetically diverse biosphere. They are hurting the longevity of our species by attempting to force others down a path that relies on technology they take for granted or more likely do not understand. You see this when they talk about animal feed corn and think we can replace those same fields at the same yields as sweet corn. They aren’t agriculturists but want to tell us how agriculture ought to be.

And it’s clearly an emotional position because you will reject any logic or reasoning they are present. They feel they are right and their righteousness is part of the argument.

You seem surprised that we have a special word for something that humans have been doing before written history.

Do you have any clever musings on the encompassing term, agriculture? Perhaps how it has culture in it and culture is emotions instead of reason.

I would like to subscribe to your newsletter. I assume the title is IaM14aNDtHisDEEP!

Are you comparing animal husbandry to owning slaves?

Militant vegans are a silly people.

In the beta, noticed this during an afternoon nap. I didn’t think how that was new until after I read an article on it. Seems like such a natural feature.

It doesn’t record the same, just a shaded bar that covers all the three sleep stages at once.

Wonder if they’ll add trends for how frequent naps are occurring.

Social Darwinism never went away, we just stopped talking about it. One might argue it’s an ingrained aspect of western civilization and beyond.

I’ll manage. I old enough that sex isn’t top of mind. It would be no different that having prostate cancer whose treatment lead to the same outcome, minus the millions.

Wait, we can push it more than twice. I’m smashing on that button until it breaks.

I can easily pay to transition back if the whole girl thing doesn’t work out.

No, it’s like how any other password manager work. They simply reinvent that concept over the past several iOS updates.

Hopefully it has “hide my email” integrated as well since that it’s key differentiator.

Streisand effect, activated.

Antiabortionists cite sources too. The passion and certainty are the same.

Vegans aren’t trying to clean up the food industry, they want to end it. Raising the issues with it just a means to that end. There are few if any vegans arguing for a cleaner animal husbandry practices.

Many vegans recognize it as a choice, like the abortion issue, they aren’t against any abortions they only choose not to themselves have an abortion. They aren’t discussing the horrors of the abortion industry on the internet.

Your passion is no different than that of the antiabortionists.

You won’t accept nuance, you don’t want to have a discussion, you want your agenda to be heard and the world to bend to your view of how things ought to be.

Yes. Mostly one topic posters.

Vegans posting about the meat industry are the like non-gamers posting about the evils of the gaming industry with a dash of moral superiority.

It’s weird for someone to center their entire online personality around something they do not do.

You are literally the one posting these. It’s all you appear to post about.

I don’t know that I would classify it as irony because the toxic male’s response is very predictable. It’s closer to a paradox. If men could universally accept women choosing the bear then would women still choose the bear?

At the surface, the strongly negative male reaction appears as a subset for why the bear is chosen but upon further exploration it reveals itself as the ultimate example for why the bear is preferred; many men cannot accept female agency.

At the same time the question reveals the rawest example of toxic masculinity. Despite the toxic males perspective that unlike women, they are not highly emotional creatures, the reality they present of themselves is they are not only highly emotional but are unable or unwilling to control their emotions.

Actually, it’s not a leap because it’s neither upwards or forwards.

The orbit is already ahead of our count so we add a day is moving us backwards along the orbital count.

If we removed a day then that missing day would be a leap day as we leap over it to the next day in the calendar.

So really this is the non-leap since we’re counting it, it’s all the other years that don’t have a 29th that are leap years because we’re leaping over the 29th day of February.

No problem

371449635398431 01/2026 202

Took off their pants and underwear?

Definitely fucked the chicken breast.

Definitely getting a urinary tract infection.

Yeah. Good thing no one recovers spam anymore. Fixed that problem!