This is a Veritasium video. Despite the clicky-baity title it’s not an indictment of democracy. He’s just talking about the mathematical problems inherent in different voting systems. YT Link here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qf7ws2DF-zk

There are also no toilets yet on Mars either, so it’s probably just as well.

Overall I thought it went well, but for me the server meshing demo was the most impressive. Really gave me hope again that they might actually be able to pull this off.

The announcement of the new Preview channel was also a bit of a pleasant surprise. Looks like at least some backers will get to test out Pyro before the end of the year.

They’ve upped their funny

The resemblance to Rygel the XVI , Dominar (deposed) to the Hynerian Empire, is remarkable.

Well that was a bit of an unexpected roller-coaster.

This mention was found in the article: “The intent of this bill was to stop this predatory bait-and-switch, deceiving women and especially at-risk women”

The article, sadly, didn’t go into much more detail regarding such incidents.

Perhaps I’m just being pessimistic, but I fully expect he’d permanently leave the country rather than spend a single day in jail. That said, perhaps it’s not all bad. We’d at least be rid of him finally.

Besides some of the other good points brought up here, I’d like to say that it’s because communist countries typically were/are anti-religion, so it makes sense that religious leaders in capitalist countries would oppose any form of government that seeks to limit organized religion. So, they support capitalism because it’s the opposite of communism.

Good, but unnecessarily long video. There were some funny bits and good examples, but it dragged on and more or less devolved into a rant video.

The correct assertion that AI doesn’t really (currently) exist could have also been better explained. Good examples of why that is true were talked about, but not in service of reinforcing that statement. Instead, the assertion was used to punctuate the examples. So good examples and correct points, but it feels like the argument could have been better made.