Whoever wrote this has serious superiority issues

Insane

We’re talking about rentals, dude. If the families could afford to buy, they wouldn’t need to pay rent.

So the point you kept missing I’ll throw you a bone man.

Someone can afford the home you’re in. This “strategy” is only effective if everyone’s on board. Otherwise a new family will be in there on the heels of your feet.

I’m not arguing with you clearly you’re just missing the point purposely or trying to strawman and move goalposts.

Obviously people can afford these homes or 100% of America’s middle class would be homeless.

No, I didn’t say that. I said a family of 3 is going to take your house if they can afford it and you’re too busy making a point to pay rent.

This is true. So not sure what point any of what you said serves, though you’re not wrong.

Also, my grandma lived inna building where 90% of the tenants did this, came together and made their demands and refused to pay rent all together.

They were all removed systematically.

Not saying it never works, but it’s alot for the average working class American to risk.

If you were happy that’s the important thing, but yes, companies still have a long (ext x 1000) way to go across the board generally.

Great theory until you get removed from your home trying to make a point because the family of 3 with nowhere else to go doesn’t have the luxury of caring about things like this thanks to the broke ass system we all reside in.

I see yeah, before all the crazy diseases borne of overpopulation etc.

Lol as long as nothing was due that day.

Company still comes first, technically!

The real rednecks call it “so-dee”

You may have taken this too seriously. Friendly got-your-back-reminder.

I’m not entirely sure what you mean by natural humans - are there artificial ones?? 🤔

Sorry I meant to clarify earlier if I didn’t, I’m on android app (Jerboa). That’s probably why

Sure, it is an extreme. As in my edit I stated: this is due to sanitation. It is all over the board throughout the 15th-18th century world because pandemics/diseases/epidemics came and went and sanitation was so low and medicine was so bad that people dropped like flies, and thus did the life expentency average.

In particular, my “25 year l.e.” example was about 18th century France.

Can you walk me through how you check it maybe I’m just not seeing the option

No? Medical care and sanitation. Unless youre speaking of a specific event in time. But yes it has tripled in the 25yo cases? Avg life span now is in the 70s.

Right, like uhh you know the average life span for a healthy male used to be 25 years right? Did you think that was for no reason? Smfh.

Did you think 90 years passed and suddenly the life span tripled?

The idiocy

Edit: to make sure some of the responses aren’t misunderstanding my point - medicine.

Scientific advances. Technology, research, people knowing how to literally wash their fucking hands added years to the lifespan.

And yes it has tripled in some cases. 18th century France the life expectancy was twenty four years old.

This increase to what we see today is LARGELY due to medical care and sanitation alone.

It’s all over the board back then, in fact, because of sanitation. Diseases would.come and go and life expentencies would sink like a tanker because sanitation was non existent.

So yes I exaggerated the time span, obviously, but I wasn’t kidding about the tripling part - if a bit vaguely.

Idk maybe I just can’t on mobile through the app I’m using (Jerboa)

Yes that’s it