• 1 Post
  • 446 Comments
Joined 8 months ago
cake
Cake day: November 8th, 2023

help-circle



  • Criticizing this video for emotional arguments doesn’t make sense. It lays down statistics, quotes privacy policies, and chips at the way Mozilla uses emotional arguments in its marketing. And I’ve seen many Firefox people simply argue “the CEO deserves to be paid well” and “Firefox is the last bastion of the open web” - arguments that I myself have at least semi agreed with, which means I might have proclivity to emotion myself.

    So if there’s a problem… Can you cite specific examples in the video?



  • Vaultwarden is a great piece of self hosted server software, which meshes with Bitwarden software perfectly. And for people who can’t self host, IMO Bitwarden gives you more than enough bang for your buck with their own hosting plans.

    It’s one of the few examples of software being open source and ethically making money regardless. (For comparison, Standard Notes has tried pretty hard to make sure non-paying users have an inferior experience even if they self-host literally everything.)






  • LWD@lemm.eetoPrivacy@lemmy.mlu mad, state?
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    4 months ago

    What did Edward Snowden do, if not technically espionage? Some other crime?

    Sometimes, it’s good to do crimes. The more oppressive the government, generally speaking, then more good things might get turned into crimes. Criticism of the government. Protest. Etc.








  • I don’t mind SimpleX. I use it myself, sometimes. But it is also currently a very obscure service, and it’s not exactly easy to find people to communicate with. Phone numbers, and now usernames, provide a jumping-off point for that.

    How do you find people on SimpleX and then make sure you’re talking to them in a group later on? Right now, that’s really hard.

    And right now, SimpleX is pretty small, so if it starts expanding in that first area, how would it prevent spam?


  • That gray text right above the buttons suggests there there won’t really be any negative impact, despite their desperate pleas right above it. I don’t know, if this was me, I would definitely click Reject All and then see how messed up the resulting website ended up for me.

    The psychological profiling that went into making equivalently styled Accept and Reject buttons look different to a reader is almost certainly intentional, though. Reminds me of the Redact app and how they would show you a crying kitten if you didn’t share using their (previously free, now expensive) app on your Twitter profile.