Well, you’re right, have an escalation procedure. However, they could just talk to whomever they think they aught to disrupt.
Well, you’re right, have an escalation procedure. However, they could just talk to whomever they think they aught to disrupt.
It’s copying. I wish they were smarter about their argument but their greed bled into their propaganda. It’s like the propaganda was only for them. This is punctuated by the fact they get very moral when it comes to their money.
My experience is that there are a lot of gay people without the queerness, and what i mean by that is they are traditional, and blend in. That said, you might know more gay folk than you think. I don’t know any effective way of identifying them, but if you’re running into a lack of online community, i suggest considering finding offline communities.
Does Android count?
I’d use legal force like police, riot control, etc.
Yeah, there wasn’t much to interpret. How would you remove disruptive people?
Put an end to their disruptive activity.
It seems clear to me. What’s wrong?
OK. then i think things are balanced.
They only shut down illegal activity.
They didn’t ban books. That’s just fake news.
Then people should have a right to shut down protestors.
They’re all psycho left.