The classic “Buy a reputable brand, cut costs and coast along on the reputation until you can sell off all your shares and move on to another company”. Bonus points for using legalised embezzlement share buyback.
The classic “Buy a reputable brand, cut costs and coast along on the reputation until you can sell off all your shares and move on to another company”. Bonus points for using legalised embezzlement share buyback.
I only ever read one, and all I remember of that was some kids being chased into a church by some demons, who then burn it down to get to them. The kids are put on trial for “forcing” the demons to burn the church, and they have to convince their lawyer not to throw the case because he’ll be executed if he wins.
And that becomes a vicious circle as more children are driven to school, making it more dangerous to walk, so more are driven…
It’s not even psychology, it’s just the optimal strategy.
Individual constituencies are still two party, it’s just not necessarily always the same two.
Poe’s law in full effect here.
gedit supremacy
For a long time Facebook counted an angry react as equal to five likes for measuring engagement. It’s very much intentional.