But do they?

No.

I changed my mind

It looks better imo

Also you will have to check whether k9 will still receive updates

Idk, a SSH-Key is also transferrable, yet it’s still safe

And given that Passkeys are essentially specialized ssh-keys, I don’t see the Problem.

But I’d like to know it I’m wrong.

The german way

“See source, no touch source” is called source-available.

“touch source, no sell source” is a new phenomenom and there are multiple names to describe this. I personally like “fair-source” though.

IMO:

The Frontend is the Problem. I borderline don’t even want to use it anymore.

Also it’d be nice if it somehow synced with my laptop

Manifest v2 still works on Firefox, so OP was right, it’s useless

That looks way longer

“just”

Sir, this is for privacy not for CSAM

No, doesn’t have the same ring to it

Ironically though Matrix has a Problem with metadata leaking out while signal doesn’t

Even better.

It’s opt-in instead of opt -out

Even then, he’s still allowed to provide binary blobs. He doesn’t have to provide it as source code. If that was the case, we’d all have to build from source and package managers like apt, dnf and flatpak wouldn’t exist.

All he has to do is make the source code available, i.e. just link back to the original Github Repo.

Licence doesn’t apply to the creator.

He already owns the copyright, he doesn’t need a licence, he doesn’t need to adhere to the gpl

This is in Germany, idk what laws in the US have to do with this

Eewww, hexbear

NixOS

Get cucked you noob

immediately going into whataboutism and trying to shift the descussion to blame the west?

c/foundtherussianbot

what? Lemmy blurs passwords now? no way! mine is sexymilffucker6969

oh no