• 1 Post
  • 90 Comments
Joined 1 year ago
cake
Cake day: July 25th, 2023

help-circle
  • I see the question differently.

    Tl;Dr:

    I think OP is hoping to read the 21st century equivalent to Muck Rakers.

    Long version:

    A whole lot of improvement in American quality of life came about as a result of publications and journalists called Muck Rakers in the 19th and 20th centuries.

    They didn’t cover false stories. They simply covered stories that newspapers owned by capitalists tried to cover up. Things like, “physical abuse inside of Factory A” or, “employees at factory B reject union contract.”

    It’s similar with r/antiwork. Most of America never realized why PopTarts were shipped with serious defects for a few months in late 2021. To most people, the quality declined out of nowhere, with no explanation.

    And I don’t think most people realized the real reason California’s ports got congested. (It was a bill designed to protect gig workers – it required shipping companies to pay truck drivers for the time they spent waiting for their trucks to be loaded (instead of just the time they spent driving)).

    People didn’t know because, even if current events directly impact everyone’s lives, all it takes is a few corporations deciding, “you don’t need to know about that” and access to the information through mainstream channels is shut off.

    Everyone using r/antiwork knew though. They knew why there was a shipping crisis, and they knew why the glue that was supposed to seal the outside of the box of Cheez-its was now instead gluing the individual Cheez-its together.

    News that wasn’t considered, “newsworthy” outside of r/antiwork got intense coverage on that subreddit.

    And yeah, the subreddit was certainly biased against those corporations. But biased or not, its users were more up-to-date on those events than anyone outside of the sub.

    I don’t think OP is asking for a leftist perspective on the same current events everyone else is covering. I think OP is asking for true, well-investigated stories that capitalists simply won’t air on the major networks.

    You know: Muck raking.








  • OwenEverbinde@lemmy.myserv.oneto196@lemmy.blahaj.zoneRule
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    A lot of people are offering explanations, but I think I’m going to give one too.

    Think of recoil in a gun. If you don’t have a mental image of it, watch a few youtube videos of people firing handguns. Look for videos of big, high-recoil handguns, like the Desert Eagle or the Magnum (or the Super Ruger Redhawk according to chat-GPT).

    You need to get a good look at handguns pushed backwards as they are fired.

    Now think about this: those bullets aren’t pushing against an atmosphere. They are pushing only against the inside of a gun.

    But when this tiny, tiny bullet pushes super-fast against the gun, using the gun to accelerate to incredibly high speeds very quickly… it pushes the gun really hard in the other direction.

    Get that mental image into your head. Small object can push large object with a lot of force by kicking off of large object with insane speed.

    Now: Take away the person holding the gun. Take away the planet. Take away the atmosphere. Put that gun in space and pull the trigger again. (Just make sure to use a gun that has modern ammunition that doesn’t require oxygen to fire).

    What happens to all that recoil? What does the recoil do to the gun now? The bullet still goes flying out of the chamber. Still does this by pushing against the gun.

    Hopefully it should now be easy to imagine that the gun will start moving.

    Rocket fuel is basically a tank full of bullets.

    The main function of rocket fuel is “heavy stuff that is shoved out of the spaceship to make it move.”

    The reason we use highly explosive fuel is because “shoving heavy stuff away from you at the speed of a bullet” is going to move you more than “shoving heavy stuff away from you at normal speed.”

    Does this make any sense?


  • I think the idea that billionaires are created by any kind of motive is the wrong lens.

    Their wealth doubles faster if they lack egalitarian values. So the millionaires who end up becoming billionaires are the ones who lack egalitarian values.

    The values they do hold could be anything from, “everyone wants to win; I’m just winning harder” to “God told me to” and it won’t matter as long as they keep reinvesting and growing their wealth faster than the economy or ecosystem can sustain.

    What we’re witnessing right now is not a set of ideas or beliefs, but an exponential growth equation – with all of the overwhelming speed and transformative power such an equation carries.

    Exponential growth is the reason for everything from the mammoths’ extinction to rotten food and the lethality of cancer. It transforms entire systems, outgrowing (and often destroying) its own host.

    If your society has currency but lacks any chemotherapy / surgery to remove concentrations of the aforementioned currency that start growing at a cancerous rate…

    Then it won’t matter what values are common or uncommon: your society is eventually doomed.

    It could take a hundred years or a thousand, but eventually, a pile of wealth will emerge that multiplies until it consumes everything.




  • OwenEverbinde@lemmy.myserv.oneto196@lemmy.blahaj.zonerule
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    10 months ago

    Plus “math skills” is one of those areas where stereotypes and self-fulfilling prophesies have incredibly influential power.

    Math is difficult for everyone, and emotional factors like, “having the confidence of yourself and your peers” are important in making it through difficulty.


  • Oddly enough, on a computer, I have not seen secant, cosecant, or cotangent.

    I have seen sin, cos, tan, arcsin, arccos, and arctan.

    Though the arc functions will only have one parameter, so if this is homework, you’ll probably be avoiding the arcs and using secant and friends

    Anyways:

    sin ( angle )

    Term In this example
    Parameter Angle is the parameter. It’s in radians, so in Java you’ll use a conversion like Math.toRadians(a) on whatever number you’re going to use as an argument
    Argument If I were to call sin(Math.PI / 4) then I would be passing the argument π / 4 to the function.
    In other words, if a parameter is a question, then an argument is an answer. If a parameter is a coin slot, than an argument is the coin you choose to insert.
    Operation An operation is practically synonymous with “function”. It is performed on inputs to arrive at an output. However, usually in code, I hear “operation” used to describe things like /, *, and +. Things that have multiple inputs and a single output, all of the same form.

    If someone is asking you, "which operation should you use in the body of function sin ( hyponetuse, opposite ) then I imagine the expected answer would be, / because

    1. / is an operation, and because
    2. opposite / hypotenuse will perform the division that yields the sine of whatever triangle those two sides belong to.

  • An algorithm is the meat of a function. It’s the “how.”

    And if you’re using someone else’s function, you won’t touch the “how” because you’ll be interacting with the “what.” (You use a function for what it does.)

    You will be creating your own algorithm by writing code, however. Because an algorithm is just a sequence of steps that, taken together, constitute an attempt at achieving an objective.

    Haus is saying all the little steps that go into approximating sine occur directly on the hardware.



  • It sounds like you were distressed and left because you didn’t know what to do or how to help.

    That’s empathy. Feeling uncomfortable when you see people in pain is empathy. And it’s normal. It’s normal for you to feel distressed around her as you hear her account. It’s normal to want to leave. It’s normal to feel guilty about leaving. It’s normal to wonder if you could have done more to help catch the bastard.

    This is awful. What you just saw is awful. What you just experienced is legitimately uncomfortable.

    And it’s hard for people to wrap their heads around, because how could your pain be valid when it’s a response to seeing someone in “real” pain? How could your pain be important when it’s nothing more than the faint echo of the pain you’re witnessing someone else go through?

    But it hurts. As selfish as it feels to hurt at a time like this, it still hurts.



  • I wish to also shill:

    The Greatest Estate Developer is about a civil engineer who gets Isekai’d into a novel (as one does in a webcomic) and is granted some magic powers (as often happens in webcomics).

    He pretty quickly declares that his goal is to build enough modern amenities (and swindle enough of his neighbors) so that he can retire and relax for the rest of his life.

    But, you know, there’s giant monsters (because it’s a webcomic) and rival dukedoms, and imperial intrigue, and he keeps finding himself in the middle of it all.

    There’s a lot of comedy, and a ridiculous bromance between him and the novel’s main character.

    But I’ll look into Terror Island and Pixel.