• 1 Post
  • 25 Comments
Joined 1 year ago
cake
Cake day: June 18th, 2023

help-circle




  • My girlfriend can’t screw them back on properly so right now she only uses each drinks bottle once

    I hate the things so much because they hurt to use, can’t really be used one-handed and also make it difficult to drink from the bottle because of the weird angles they implicate.

    So I’ve been cutting the caps off and cutting the little limbs off and making what was previously one piece of plastic into three, which I obviously also hate doing.

    In the past I would always screw the lid back on before binning it, either to trap the air out or for the sake of completeness, so in my particular case this policy is very much the worst of all worlds, I hope the data shows that I’m an edge case though if they’re passing it into law.






  • Pyrozo007@lemmy.dbzer0.comtoMemes@lemmy.mlgrammarphobia
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    I would argue it does make a difference. Like I said, many people don’t fit gender norms, but most people do. So knowing it’s a woman shopping can suggest a array of things.

    • She will likely be buying some degree more female-oriented or marketed products, a strong example being tampons or a weaker example being beauty products

    • Her experience shopping will be that of a woman’s, i.e. she might get patronised in the hardware section or sales-bullied in the technology section, both of which are quite common for women even now

    I really can’t think of an example where you interact with other people where a woman’s experience won’t be affected by her being a woman.




  • Pyrozo007@lemmy.dbzer0.comtoMemes@lemmy.mlgrammarphobia
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    16
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    I couldn’t disagree more, many people may not fit into genders, but most people do and simply knowing whether someone is a man or a woman is very useful. Gendered nouns though, like in French, Spanish, Italian etc. serve no purpose but do encode redundancy into the language which can be very valuable for speaking in loud places




  • It has to be blatant because people miss the point regularly.

    I hadn’t thought about that, it makes me think then about whether the stories could remain as blatant but have more depth. For example the court episode didn’t have any story beyond ‘Society (and Admiral April) is hypocritical and and racist’ by demonstrating it through one person’s story, and at the end of the story nothing has changed. I’m watching Discovery now and it’s going for a similarly blatant racial and cultural purity is evil antagonist so far, but it feels like it’s setting it up to be the antagonists’ folly, which would be more of an interesting story.



  • Correct. How do you propose I live in the modern world without a phone that uses cobalt?

    There is a phrase that describes this situation: “There is no ethical consumption under capitalism”

    There is nothing I can do while living in the modern world without benefitting from exploitation or encouraging evil, that’s the point of the The Good Place quote I included.

    I’m already depressed about it, I don’t really want to be berated for it when there’s nothing I can do about it. I already buy all my clothes second hand, fight my phone and laptop for basic privacy rights, vote for the least evil politician I can, I don’t own a car.




  • Yes I get that, I simply find it doesn’t achieve that goal and that its attempts to do so are without subtlety and overly contemporary, I’m now watching Discovery and in S01E03 or so, Captain Lorca cites Elon Musk as a great innovator.

    The show is already dated and it’s only 5 years old, that’s a major downside.

    I think it’s primarily the shallow depth of the prejudice confrontation that causes the problem, I don’t remember any episodes so far which didn’t feel like primary school level metaphors for racism etc. A more tactful and/or deeper writer would perhaps cause me no issues