I like going places where other people don’t go, and thus almost by definition will not be connected by public transport.

What the hell am I reading

I’d rather they have a hand-washing policy that is not only ruthless but also ruthlessly enforced.

This works very very well for me as well.

Make sure every point you make is objectively sustainable and don’t deviate from the truth. People hate having rock-solid bullet-pointed lists describing why they’re idiots chucked at them.

Laden or unladen?

(Sorry, I only vaguely remember the sketch)

What’s wrong with being anti-billionaire?

If a dragon were hoarding all the gold in your village and leaving the villagers to get fucked, would you be pro-dragon?

(Yeah it’s a Terry Pratchett novel.)

These people read the cliffnotes and take everything at face value. Reasoning on material does not get you clicks.

Been reading too much Asimov, I see.

It’s like playing a weird version of Russian roulette. Might be a spectacular set of tits, might be a gape.

It does matter, because the article uses the word “want”.

Why are we saying “engineers” when we know full well there isn’t a single qualified engineer in there that thinks this bullshit is a good idea?

This is management being management.