What firefox version? It could be that you are using xwayland depending on your or your distros settings. Maybe try setting
$ MOZ_ENABLE_WAYLAND=1 firefox
What firefox version? It could be that you are using xwayland depending on your or your distros settings. Maybe try setting
$ MOZ_ENABLE_WAYLAND=1 firefox
According to the manpage --Yay --clean
is the thought behind it, its a Yay specific shortcut for pacman -Rs $(pacman -Qqdt)
R
emove recurs
ive what the Q
uery q
uiet (short names) on the d
atabase lists as unrequired t
Now -Yc
does not sound that bad.
It is still good to learn the verbose commands for pacman/paru/yay from the manpages, once you are familiar with them its easy to build more advanced commands for special use-cases.
multiple people warned them not to use arch.
My IT Bros said the same back when I had to choose W10 or Linux, they haven’t used arch and I had 0 Linux experience. I messed up every single step of the installation to a point where I knew from the problems I created what I did wrong. After many tries and a week later I had a working installation with dual boot. Never used windows and removed it a year later. It was rough but I learned how to recover from most errors a user can create.
If learning is the goal arch and arch-wiki is great.
SwayWM, but I think any of those you mentioned should be able to do it?
the wording was a bit of, it should spell “carcasses raised with their own shit”
A section of the A24 was limited to 130 kmph for 20 years to reduce accidents. Because the reduction the speed limit was lifted early this year. Now there are 8% more accidents with injury and 42% more injured. Politicians call now to make it possible to limit the section again.
Try this: https://makefrontendshitagain.party/
Animal products. No, it was not worth it.
Eat the rich is the only not plant based diet I support.
Go vegan for the animals - and to stop supporting meat conglomerates owned by billionaires.
I think it is higher, the current food production is something like 25% of the global GHG emissions, 2/3 are from the animal industry. Besides the direct impact there is less land use and the opportunity to re-nature large areas.
Even if we could cut all fossil fuels, the animal industry would push us over the Paris goal. Changing what we eat is a option we all have but let’s not mention that
Billionaires like Joesley Batista?
No, I am against the prohibition of common terms, I advocate for a stricter declaration of ingredients. “Milk” alone could be milk from any mammal, cow, goat, human. Steak could be a cut from any animal, that is why a the animal it is from is declared. Oat milk is called milk since centuries but now the industry fears competition and is publishing propaganda and pays lobbyism for restrictive laws.
Right, but ‘steak’ does mean a little more than that. It also would indicate a particular kind of cut of meat, which would generally indicate minimal connective tissue, tenderness, location, etc.
So as long as it has “steak” written on it you just care that is any animal with those properties?
Would you like ‘meat-free’ labels allowed on foods that had absolutely no muscle-tissue content, but did contain animal organ, bone, and fat content?
I want a strong indicator that a product contains any animal products. There are already many labels for plant based products but none are required by any law.
I am in strong favor a big prominent “contains animal products” label. It would make live so much easier.
I too eat in the dark.