If it works, it works.

I agree and disagree at the same time.
I agree, people should learn how to use technology.
I disagree, technology should be easy to use.

You need to separate most materials in order to recycle them. The plastic of a lid is different from that of a bottle which are both different from a wrapping. Separating materials is key to successful recycling. A lot of times stuff can’t get recyled because people don’t separate it before throwing it away.

Or you could just use, you know, reusable materials.

Thanks a lot for the info! :)

Bottom left is from Drew Gooden.

Bacon of hope, frying oil on canvas

If it’s a website which only works with a specific browser, it’s a shitsite.

and yes, largely correlates with maturity

That’s where we disagree. You say that as if it were a proven fact. If you got studies on that, please report.

My point is, that at least from my experience there is a lot more to maturity than mere age. And you can’t really know if you just superficially look at someone and their age.

Any quantitative measure of maturity is definitely correlated with age.

Is it? Do you have numbers on that?

I am already happy if there is any documentation at all. And I am euphoric if it doesn’t suck, i.e. sufficiently detailed and up to date.

So I guess Discord is better than nothing. But sure it’s a turn off.

Putting arbitrary numbers on people to measure their matureness is weird to me.

There are 15 year old people who are wiser and more mature than a lot with 50.

You can’t know without knowing the person.

Imperfect political and economic systems like our current version of capitalism and democracy. (Both could be better, or even replaced by something different which is better.)

Violence.

Judging without critical and unbiased thinking.

But the interaction of a quantum particle (in the system of the falling tree) with other particles and, on a larger scale, molecules, already represents an observation and information exchange. Therefore, while not 100% certain, it is extremely probable that the falling tree will make a sound. Isn’t it?

Community. We call it a community.

Raytracing produces realistic visual effects without requiring tricks like ambient occlusion, screen-space reflections, shadow resolution and so on, since those emerge as a result of raytracing anyway and are much more realistic. I’m currently rendering a Donut in Blender where the effects are clearly visible in comparison.

However, due to the high amount of optimization in visually impressive realtime rendering engines like game engines, I agree with you that I don’t see many benefits comparing ray tracing in games with contemporary alternative techniques.

Nevertheless I think that’s the future. In the long run, there’s nothing better, i.e. more accurate, than simulating the behavior of light when it comes to visual realism.

That’s not cool. How long did you wait for them to act? I guess it can take some time until they went through all reports. Moderating is a time-intensive process. But if that’s not the case here, then I agree with you that this sucks and there should be consequences.

Yes. Thank you, a little mistake. Fixed it. :) (After 3 months. :D )

You’re welcome. :>

And here I am fixing missing sources on some wiki articles just yesterday.

If you want to save: :wq

Or :x