Error on the link
Error on the link
How did so many vote yes for this? Mine didn’t, but that’s kind of a no brainer given their constituency.
I was laughing at your comment, showing a love of baseball, and poorly trying to show I’m a birds fan
This was really helpful. Hoping to be part of a new wave of sports users.
Thanks. I’m trying to get my brother over to lemmy. First thing he asked was, how’s the sports comms?
Lol, poor bot. Who should I talk to about booting them back up again, at least for orioles games?
DEGUSTIBUSNONESTDISPUTANDUM
not sure I spelled it right, means “regarding personal tastes, there is no dispute”
Also another good one, “moderation in everything, including moderation.”
I never knew twinkle twinkle little star and the alphabet song were put to the same melody. Thank you!
Fucking well done comment, sir. Thank you
So it’s like saying something is in danger when it was never there to begin with?
Lol I guess I am.
I just finished listening to this. It feels like he embraces the bias, but shows that’s is only as biased as the history we learn in school.
What is a fella? Sorry for the ignorance.
True enough. I agree. But I also think the age is a serious part of it too.
Jesus fuck. He’s too old and displaying signs of aging that are incompatible with leading the country. He needs to step aside.
AI tldr
The Bloomberg article discusses the Pentagon’s dilemma regarding the 2019 US law that prohibits the Defense Department from contracting with entities using Huawei equipment. The Pentagon argues it cannot avoid Huawei due to its global telecommunications presence, essential for military logistics. The Pentagon seeks a waiver from this restriction, citing national security concerns, but Congress has so far resisted, reflecting growing anti-China sentiment. The debate continues, with some officials pushing for stricter adherence to the law and others acknowledging the necessity of limited exemptions to maintain operational efficiency in critical regions.
What does the Quran say about black holes?