Just another Swedish programming sysadmin person.
Coffee is always the answer.
And beware my spaghet.
One thing you can test is to apply a Chrome user-agent on Firefox when visiting YouTube. In my personal experience that actually noticeably improves the situation.
The first official implementation of directly connecting WhatsApp to another chat system - using APIs built specifically for purpose instead of third-party bridges - was indeed done against the Matrix protocol, as part of a collaboration in testing ways to satisfy the interoperability requirements of the EU Digital Services Act.
So not a case of a third-party bridge trying to act as a WhatsApp client enough to funnel communication, but instead using an official WhatsApp endpoint developed - by them - explicitly for interoperation with another chat system.
I think the latest update on the topic is the FOSDEM talk that Matthew held this February.
Edit: It’s worth noting that the goal here is to even support direct E2EE communication between users of WhatsApp and Matrix, something that’s not likely to happen with the first consumer-available release.
Well, the first tests for interconnected communication with WhatsApp were done with Matrix, so that’s a safe bet.
I’ve heard quite a lot of discourse in regards to unlawful gameplay, I just personally have trouble seeing how it could ever be non-aggressive, it’s by its very definition antagonistic after all. Could definitely vary in the amount of aggression though, and CIG’s definition of “unaggressive unlawful” seems to be stealth - which I can definitely get behind.
CIG does at least seem to finally be adding more versions of actually non-aggressive lawful missions, not just the various flavours of hand-box delivery missions we have today.
To be fair, I’d consider a silent assassination to be nowhere near as aggressive as a full frontal assault.
With how much security they’re speaking about, it does makes sense that even “low-aggression” unlawful activities would still potentially involve a whole bunch of combat.
Version requirements? No rules!
He won’t be allowed to perform at Eurovision with the Windows 95 name/trademark/logo, so it would be hilarious if he switches to a name like Linuxman during it.
This looks really odd in relation to other fediverse software; Why /magic
and required to be on the root of the domain? Why hard-require routing the domain part of the user ID when .well-known/webfinger
exists? Why is there a X-Open-Web-Auth
header which the spec only describes as “its purpose is unclear from the code”?
So many questions.
I definitely like the idea of distributed sign-in, Solid did a decent work of that many years ago after all. This particular proposal just looks rather odd.
Here’s a .jxl
JPEG-XL upload I did on Lemmy three days ago;
https://lemmy.ananace.dev/pictrs/image/ad4e745e-0135-4cc3-889c-052600828d82.jxl
The built-in Firefox support is only activated for unstable builds, so you can’t enable it on stable unless you manually enable it during compile-time.
Why is it .jpg
and not .jxl
? That’s the registered extension for JPEG-XL.
I can already imagine so many fun ways this could be used.
“We interrupt your regular scheduling to bring you this additional bit of Factorio hype.”
Flatpak uses OSTree - a git-like system for storing and transferring binary data (commonly referred to as ‘blobs’), and that system works by addressing such blobs by hashes of their content, using Linux hardlinks (multiple inodes all referring to the same disk blocks) to refer to the same data everywhere it’s used.
So basically, whenever Flatpak tells OSTree to download something, it will only ever store only copy of that same object (.so-file, binary, font, etc), regardless of how many times it’s used by applications across the install.
Note that this only happens internally in the OSTree repo - i.e. /var/lib/flatpak
or ~/.local/share/flatpak
, so if you have multiple separate Flatpak installations on your system then they can’t automagically de-duplicate data between each other.
A lot of that data doesn’t actually exist, ostree hardlinks data blobs internally, so the actual size on disk is much smaller than most disk usage tools will show.
Probably not what you’re looking for, but I’m going to note that Turris make some great OpenWRT routers.
Currently running theTurris Omnia, and using both Wireguard and Yggdrasil through it.
I’ve been personally using KDEs Itinerary app, but it might not be what you’re looking for
It could be interesting with something like the old Pharaoh game and its receding riverbed farming, but you’d have to balance that compared to costs of resourcing in Factorio - or offer some reasonably simple way for the player to protect their resourcing operations against the rising lava.
My guess is that drilling is going to cause the Vulcanus-version of pollution, since it makes sense that a volcanic planet wouldn’t have much problem with regular pollution.
Both the rendezvous/mailbox and transport servers are available under an MIT license, though not every client makes it easy to use your own rendezvous.
I personally use the rymdport GUI client and the rust CLI.