Removed by mod
Removed by mod
ok lol. I think everything I said is pretty relevant to the discussion.
You didn’t give objective reasons, you just gave some opinions about how the gameplay is repetitive. Like I said, games are meant to be fun. If someone had fun, it did not “fail to perform”. The reason I believe you are biased is because you are the op of this thread lmao
The basic standards of a game is “is it fun”. If people had fun then it served it’s purpose. Just because you didn’t like it doesn’t mean it’s an objectively bad game. I highly doubt your opinion on the game is free of external biases
Hogwarts Legacy is rife with problems and those problems are objective. It’s not based on opinion.
It’s so funny when people try to claim that their opinion is objective. Sorry bro, this is still your opinion. LOTS of people enjoyed the game, and if people enjoyed the game safe to say it did its job.
Why should she care what a bunch of terminally online weirdos think about her? She has been extremely successful in her field and demonstrated that a woman can have success in a male dominated industry. Transgenders just hate her because she doesn’t think trans woman are woman because she believes woman means adult human female. That is a reasonable position to hold.
How many homeless people in the USA do you think can work but refuse to? Hint: a lot of them.
it is a job not an investment
where did I say that
Something can be both an investment and a job. If you found a startup, for instance. I just don’t get the meaningless arguments about how maintaining a property isn’t a job. If it requires you to work, then it’s a job.
Why are we gatekeeping the word job? all a job is “a task or piece of work, especially one that is paid” that seems to fit the definition of a homeowner renting out their property.
It is absolutely a job if you personally handle upkeep. Managing something is still a job. Although if you outsource every aspect of it I would consider it more an investment.
My point is that you said the argument has been disproven when I believe it has yet to be fully understood.
and how is that relevant? can homelessness be a problem and the economy be good at the same time?
there is little incentive for left wing rags to report on these topics
My point is that a lot of homeless people aren’t to be trusted to take care of the space they live in. There would have to be some screening to make sure that these people are capable of not destroying the public good they are being offered for free. I don’t think it’s really debatable that there are some truly awful homeless people, violent, mean, entitled, and not fit to live in a proper society. It’s something people need to face the facts on. So we need to find out how to help the good homeless people before we let the bad ones ruin it for the rest of them.
Then don’t get a job that works into the night. Jobs that you work past 6 are the minority of jobs.
I disagree that giving drug addicts a free and unlimited supply of drugs is the best way to fight drug addiction. Treatment (with forced holds) I’m a proponent of.
I didn’t make any claims about housing first policy, read the comment you are replying to. I know you barely looked at the articles because they are not about the same single hotel.
You can get a curfew exception if you are working.
I don’t think she’s a piece of shit. She inspired a generation of young woman. I don’t think she’s a bigot just because she believes that there is a distinction between males and females.