I had no problems communicating a higher limit. They are not AWS but you can get 100s of instances.
It doesn’t stop overnight. In fact it has noticeably slowed down already. Of course the process becomes quicker when Greenland freshwater runoff becomes massive.
Connect your server to the Fritzbox via a patch cable.
Are the alternatives feature-complete in regards to GitLab CE?
Do not use WLAN, use wired Ethernet. What’s your upstream? It’s limiting the rate you can serve the content.
Doomscrolling used to have a meaning of browsing /r/collapse and /r/collapsescience rather than /r/worldnews
EdgeRouter is proprietary but minimal. You can also look at Opnsense running on a used thin client off ebay.
I was on Reddit since the beginning. It was mailing lists before and Usenet in the 1990s.
Lemmy now is how early Reddit used to be, only more jaded.
As long as you do it on your subscribed communities. With the volume going up time to become more focused: /c/technology noise level is getting too high.
Saves money for you and keeps functional hardware away from the landfill.
Yes, but all mine are off. For powersaving reasons.
1 kW would cost me some 17 EUR/day. Or over 6100 EUR per year.
I’m on LineageOS sans gapps, so not even Google Play available. If it’s not open source, it’s not there.
I know about Servermonkey, and the prices there aren’t nice at all. I’m rather sticking with old servers with roughly the same specs, but perhaps twice the wattage and noise, which only run occasionally. The 24/7 stuff is already on a low-power footprint, though I don’t have a successor for that little Supermicro when it bites the dust. I’d rather pay way less than 1 kEUR for it.
Actually, these are mostly dual-socket boxes with lots of cores, ECC RAM and lots of 3.5", 2.5" spindles and SSDs, plus private storage networks, and such.
Instead of a NUC I run a 1U Supermicro 8-core Atom C2758 with 16 GB RAM and SSDs which is quite durable but will die eventually. With more modern hardware I meant something like that, only with onboard 10G and/or 50G (SFP+/SFP28/SFP56) with more and better cores as well as onboard NVMe along with frontal SAS/SATA slots. And of course some larger SSDs to populate these.
I agree. Which is why I only run a firewall on a thin client, a low-power 8-core Atom C2758 Proxmox with SSDs and an external HDD and a fanless switch, all for about 70 W total 24/7/365. Any other server is one of the 120 W, 300 W or 500 W kind. These do add up.
It’s Germany. Regular rates are some 0.3 EUR/kWh at the moment, I hope to be there by May next year. Meanwhile, I currently make some half of my net power with photovoltaics. It helps to keep the costs down.
I’m actually making about 6 kWh/day from photovoltaics since mid-April averaged, which is about half my last year’s total electric energy consumed. I might be able to boost that to 8 kWh/day later this year. This is all while running very little infrastructure, for cost reasons.
Thanks, good info. Never had any problems with pfsense or opnsense with Intel server NICs personally. Other than being fried.