Wait until you find out about Duesenberg. They made 400hp supercharged straight 8 monsters that cost more than a doctors annual salary back in the 20’s and 30’s. They were much faster than even race cars of the era. IMO the first relative “hypercars” if you compare what else was available.

Well, I was kinda taking the piss at OP for such a weak post. Colours are kindergarden opinions.

Woosh.

Yellow is the best car color. More cars should be painted yellow. There’s not enough out there.

I think we’ve been far more evil towards them than the other way around. We cut the most beautiful of them to make furniture after all.

IN what way would that be evil? They produce the very thing that keeps us alive by transforming what kills us.

Ford haven’t used pushrod mustang engines since the 4.6 from the early 90’s.

My point is, if you gotta do that, it’s not good meat.

Because of the smoke. But while I don’t have as strong a feeling as op on this since it’s very much a first world problem, turkey really has a bland, inoffensive taste while I could smoke a rat to be delicious.

Yeah but why 85. You must have a specific model in mind or something to be this precise. And, not to be confronting or anything, but what do you like about how these cars drive?

What happened in 85?

Very specific, care to elaborate why?

Yet you asked “what is this”. Lol, you’re tripping balls mate. Plus who are you to decide what’s good, bad, strong or weak. Especially with some bullshit like “it’s apart from the world” (it’s not, it’s definitely part of it you aren’t transcending dimensions here). Anyway get some sleep.

Give me an example of a better answer to whatever you wrote here. And I wasn’t trying to be insulting I’m sorry. It’s just very hard to understand what you are questionning beyond “society bad! Yes/No?”

What do you think then?

Or did you really only want someone to answer you “It’s hell” and confirm your bias? You really read like an angsty teenager who just had it’s first joint and 101 philosophy class.

Edit: Are you suggesting people shouldn’t have the right to debate with one another? Or that some should get it but not the others?

edit:edit: Why are YOU doing it?

Is there still some that use it because all the others did? Copycat style just to fit in and feel legit to unknowing listeners?

Ok thanks finally some insight on your thoughts. See how it gives better context than just saying “What is this” and gesticulating towards the internet. Your question was heavily influenced by prejudice.

Most of the talk does not refer to fantasy, that is a great example of some “unempirical evidence”. Some do, a lot don’t, you need to be able to filter that. Sure If you look for it, the worst will appear. But stop mindlessly reading what pops in front of you and make some active research and your worldview might change.

The rest is just you thinking out loud. Nobody takes everything so seriously all the time about every subject. Honestly I’m thinking you are falling for what you seem so concerned about. Look away from the endless stream sometimes. Search for your own source of news. Make your own change. The world certainly looks grim if we let rampant capitalism unleashed, but you are not proposing anything here. This here post is you disguising a rant into a question.

I’d say the 2010’s or so. The garbage tech from the 70’s 80’s was finally completely gone. Manufacturing quality seemed to find it’s stride with better materials, insulation and finishing even on a budget. Screens also weren’t as ubiquitous so interiors were practical and will age well. We got the GTR, some amazing GT3’s, Mustangs were better than they ever did, the LaFerrari/918/p1 trio jumpstarted an entirely new category and feel free to add cause I’m probably missing a bunch.

These were great changes from the 90’s where the tech was impressive but early CAD designs suck to work and fix. The 00’s brought terrible styling on top of that while still being low tech.

Sorry my man but you are not clear at all. I’m trying to understand what you do not understand about people talking with each other. There’s nothing more to it. It’s neither good nor bad nor strong or weak, it’s just a discussion. What happens afterwards with the information each gathered from the discussion is different but we need context. It’s what the discussion is ABOUT that is important not the discussion in itself.

So give us some context. Are you talking about journalism in media or are you also questioning whether we should discuss our hobbies with like minded individuals? Are you implying there’s something wrong with social media because it allow anyone to talk with anybody about anything?

WIthout answers to these your questions is pointless I’m afraid.

edit: Otherwise, if I try to answer your question as it was written: Yes it’s good, Yes it’s bad. More details are needed to judge beyond that.

A conversation, simply. There’s no requirements for having a discussion. That’s what we do, we speak to each other whether for good or bad.

And just in case because I’m still not completely sure if you are actually asking something or just making a social comment on online media; The literal antonym to what you seem to describe would be a “subjective” or “speculative” discussion. There’s other antonyms but I’ll let you search those out to see which fits your need.