Interests: Science, boardgames, urbanism, public transport and cycling, sports (doing not following it), brighter future (while being way too cynical)…

  • 0 Posts
  • 8 Comments
Joined 1 year ago
cake
Cake day: June 16th, 2023

help-circle
  • neutronicturtle@lemmy.worldtoMemes@lemmy.mlLogic 100
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    (Established) scientists have a long history of ignoring new theories not science itself. But that’s because at the end of the day scientists are still human.

    Science is not great at working on a very short time scales. But give it enough time so more evidence is gathered and possibly some stubborn influential people (that can’t accept a new theory) die and generally we get closer and closer to truth.


  • neutronicturtle@lemmy.worldtoMemes@lemmy.mlPlant based rice
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    It all depends on what is actually trying to be communicated. With your definition most meals would be plant based so why even bother to say it. With definition where plant based means no animal products it communicates that it is fine for vegans and it’s likely less offensive for people allergic to word “vegan”.


  • It all depends on what is actually trying to be communicated. With your definition most meals would be plant based so why even bother to say it. With definition where plant based means no animal products it communicates that it is fine for vegans and it’s likely less offensive for people allergic to word “vegan”.


  • neutronicturtle@lemmy.worldtoMemes@lemmy.mlPlant based rice
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    Language is interesting in this way. Same words in different contexts mean different things.

    “Based on true events” = “Contains traces of what actually happened”

    “Plant based” = “Does not contain animal products but can contain mushrooms even though they are not plants”




  • Indeed. It takes time.

    And there needs to be an actual alternative to driving. You can’t just make driving worse and expect results. I’ve found that even small positive changes in alternative methods of commuting can have disproportionately positive effect. For example at work we simply installed better and more bike racks and it seems that after a while we have maybe twice the number of people regularly cycling compared to before. Basically because cycling accommodations got nicer a few more people started cycling and then others saw that it is not only feasible but also enjoyable so they started cycling… If we could only fix few sections of the road leading to our facility… Once can dream.

    But yes, change takes time.


  • One of my first weird (culture shocky) experiences from USA (Tennessee) during my first trip there was with a drive thru.

    I wanted to grab something to eat in the evening and there was a fast food place just across the street from my hotel so I decided to walk there. Once there I realized that the main part of the restaurant is closed and only drive thru was open. Then as I was there on foot they wouldn’t serve me so I ended up walking to a petrol station down the road to actually buy something to eat which was quite scary as there were no sidewalks and I had to cross 6 lanes to get to the station.