I waddled onto the beach and stole found a computer to use.
🍁⚕️ 💽
Note: I’m moderating a handful of communities in more of a caretaker role. If you want to take one on, send me a message and I’ll share more info :)
If you are using any Synology products with your setup, you should go ahead and apply the recommended updates
As for voting under duress, it’s also a concern with mail in ballots and voting by phone. It can be worse with online in the same way that scams are easier online.
I know someone who voted by phone this recent election in my home province, and they were eligible to do so because of sudden health issues. The phone call included multiple people who verified their information, took down the vote, and then verified the vote. I imagine something would get flagged if there was any discrepancy.
I’d also like to link to this Tom Scott video
Why Electronic Voting Is Still A Bad Idea: https://youtube.com/watch?v=LkH2r-sNjQs
The strongest argument for me: trust
Even with our paper ballots, hand counting, and many checks along the way, people now have doubts about the accuracy of the results. No matter how good the tech is, it will be impossible to convince the general public that the online votes are accurate.
Also this classic xkcd
It actually worked for me, thank you for finding that!
I also saw the error message where the thumbnail should be:
But if you click on the time stamp down below, you get an image:
Pasted the image below:
Huh
https://en.m.wiktionary.org/wiki/motel
Blend of motor + hotel, from the original Motel Inn of San Luis Obispo in California, USA, established in 1925 by Arthur Heineman (1878–1974).
While looking for a term to describe the original post, and came across this. I’m going to make a separate post about it
Oh this would be amazing, I was using a third party site.
Would it be possible to get a similar one for the dearrowed version? That was a complaint I got once but didn’t have an easy a solution for: https://lemmy.ca/post/31890393
There was the attack on the Internet archive recently, are there any good options out there to help mirror some of the data or otherwise provide redundancy?
One option that I’ve heard of in the past
ArchiveBox is a powerful, self-hosted internet archiving solution to collect, save, and view websites offline.
Makes me think of this classic:
Instead of our, they use are as if they forgot the word our exists.
I’m not sure if I’ve seen this, is this about the pronunciation?
We’re the giants in their ‘Human and the grass-stalk’ story
This could be a Goosebumps cover if it had slightly different styling
Is this related to the new laws in Europe? I remember seeing something about Facebook introducing a paid tier
Taking a look at the current sidebar, it might be nice to reorganize the stats section completely
What I’m thinking is:
By default it will only show some stats, where users can select what stats they want displayed in the settings. This way I can hide the stuff I don’t care about, instead of having to look through the already busy list.
**Statistics:** [✏️edit]
- Monthly Active Users: 4,000
- Total Subscribers: 30,000
[ v see all v ]
Then expanding the box will give the full list of stats:
[ ^ collapse ^ ]
**Statistics:**
Active Users:
- By day: 800
- By week: 1,200
- By month: 4,000
- By year: 24,100
Subscribers:
- Total: 30,000
- Local: 12,000
Comments:
- Total: 81,000
- Today: 510
- This week: 1,315
[... etc]
It opens up the possibility of including more items in that list. We could also replace the expand
option with a link to a full statistics dashboard page.
Creating a bunch of accounts possibly to manipulate votes
Looking from the admin level, doesn’t happen that often. Vote manipulation is already something we keep an eye out for, and usually it’s done to highlight certain content (ex. pushing some political angle) rather than boosting one community over another.
you can stop seeing by adjusting your “Show Bot Accounts” setting
I like some bots, but I only subscribe to a bot-only community if the volume of posts is reasonable.
Alternatively, I think both metrics are helpful in different ways
- Quality over Quantity: MAU counts lurkers equally with active participants. PCM focuses on actual engagement.
- True Reflection of Activity: A community with 1000 MAU but only 10 posts/comments is less vibrant than one with 100 MAU and 500 posts/comments.
I’d say votes are also an important part of engagement. It helps differentiate between good and bad content. I’m more likely to join a community with a few good posts a day (or even a week) than a bot community with many posts a day. Going by how the subscribers counts change over time, I’d say this is a common experience.
- Spam Resistance: Creating multiple accounts to inflate MAU is easy. Generating meaningful posts and comments is harder.
While any abuse is bad, spam posts and comments are a bigger concern right now. AI generated spam / link spam is obnoxious and we deal with it often (as admins/mods). While someone could make lots of accounts to inflate MAU, it only really affects the community ranking against other communities and not day to day usage. Lemmy is already considering removing the trending section, and admins usually step in if a bunch of similar accounts are created at once.
- Easier to Track: No need for complex user tracking. Just count posts and comments.
I’m not sure I understand this point. Are the vote/comment/post calculations very resource intensive?
All that being said
Maybe Fossify Gallery?
I see this issue requesting Ultra HDR instead of regular HDR
https://github.com/FossifyOrg/Gallery/issues/166
So it might have regular HDR?
This is good feedback, and I agree. I try my best to limit moderation to content that needs removing, and simply vote on the rest.
One thing I find is that mods are more likely to remove/nuke a thread when they’re stretched thin or there is a wave of rule breaking content. Bringing on more active mods can help so that each mod can spend more time scrutinizing each post.
The other great thing about the Fediverse is that you can make your own version of a community if you disagree with how one is being run. I’ve joined a few communities with different styles of moderation
What communities do you check that are more quiet now?
Very cool, and thank you for taking the time to make such a detailed post!