But that means they seek projects that must be profitable and that’s exactly why I want the bloated investment power off their hands and into public projects that value psyche and society in the long run. Profit seeking leads to sick companies like Apple etc. with stances like “the customer should not be able to repair their shit”.

Is it possible to set a roof on private wealth? Everything above put into public funds? Give them a “you win at capitalism” trophy and let them into some other game to play.

And passing is still according to the speed limit.

Norway. (And neighbour Sweden).

Extreme weather “Hans” with high winds and LOTS of downpour hitting us. Expecting floods and earth slides.

Edit: We got floods and earth slides.

[email protected]

We did an akward block passing. “Go left, no, right, no, left, no, right.”

I’m starting to wonder if a limit to personal wealth could counteract this. Say $20 mill. That includes ALL personal wealth – stocks to property. Everything above goes into funds managed by scientific counsils or to a semidemocratic technocrat government.
Anyhow, I recon it needs to be funneled to people that lead by humane ideals and not let singular persons that go by money for moneys sake have such ridiculous amounts of power.

On dhat note, dhe English language is kwite inkonsistent on letter pronunsiashion. I think it kould do widh a refresher on how letters work or just do a round of simplifikashion on sounds instead of being a Frankenstein fokusing on where the word kame from.

Yeah, I get more of a cyperpunk dystopia vibe.

There’s a new r/place event?

It would be useful if people actually used it to burrow trolls, sealions and irrelevant comments as intended, but as I’ve seen people can’t be trusted with that because as you say: It becomes a “disagree” instead, that targets everything that people disagree with. It gets inane on political topics where useless comments for the right tribe gets immensely upvoted. “Covfefe” Yes, very informative. There could be alternate vote for agreement, funny, or troll mark.

Moral panic? What? It’s about healthy community dialogue and slightly how downvotes impacts the psyche.
If someone tells you why they dislike something you like, you’re not doing anyone a favor by downvoting it.

This is why the Beehaw way is a good approach. No downvotes only upvotes. Then people actually have to tell why they disagree.

Gender congruence.

Cis or trans would be a person’s gender experience congruity?

So just the interactions with the posts are blocked, not the posts themselves? I find it a bit weird, but OK.

Oh no please, not the nicknames. Can we leave them?

This also happens in the comments which is cool! Tho I can foresee it becoming rather annoying in high activity places.

The “Choose your reply (or none)” mechanic of ‘Oxenfree’.

It’s like a new chapter of internet history! Maybe. Seeing Reddit getting dark was chilling. Edit: Wait, some subreddits did go dark already, right? Or am I just feeling the pressing atmosphere?